The results indicate that PH had a highly significant positive correlation with SD, NB, LL, LW, LEL, TLS, ST, SIL, and TNR at the P < 0.001 significance level and with NNS at P < 0.01 significance level ( Fig 2 ).
Excerpts
Per protocol population positive outcomes were 30/39 (76.9%) for dimeticone and 10/29 (34.5%) for malathion with a more highly significant (p<0.001) difference of 42.4% (20.7% to 64.2%).
The results indicate that significant differences were found across all four variables (p < 0.01), with the following specific findings: Interior spatial design satisfaction: The differences among groups were highly significant (F = 437.234, p < 0.001).
These results are statistically highly significant, both, compared to neighborhoods of ordinary genes in the network ( p = 0.001) and compared to TF neighborhoods in randomized networks ( p <0.001).
This analysis confirmed that the increase in braille reading speed was highly significant (effect of testing session: F(5, 130) = 35.85, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.57).
6B and 6A , respectively) there was a highly significant effect of treatment (SSE, DMSO control, medium control) (p<0.001); nematodes exposed to SSE displayed a shorter median lifespan than the respective DMSO and medium only controls.
7WD10 cells exposed to different concentrations of 2-CDA revealed highly significant reductions at 0.1 μM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 μM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 μM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 μM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 μM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells ( Figure 7A & B ).
At the hematological level, all patients with low LMR presented lymphopenia, with a highly significant difference compared to those with high LMR (p < 0.001).
Standard ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant differences in mean values among groups, ***p < 0.001.
The analysis revealed a highly significant association between these variables (χ 2 (72)=1963.48, p < 0.001).
The linear component of the non-linear spline was highly significant in patients with normal CRP concentrations (p<0.001).
In our study, the bivariate inverse associations between physical activity and both depression and anxiety were modest, despite being highly significant (p < 0.001).
Classification into species related to p-distances When species were considered as classes of objects and used in a db-RDA for predicting the variability in the p-distances, the adjusted explained variation was 87.4%, relations being highly significant (test on all axes, pseudo-F = 205, p = 0.001; Fig S3 in S1 Supp orting Information ).
In this model, the OR for having a non-HIV-associated condition listed on the death certificate in 2004 compared to 1999 was 1.6 (95%CI = 1.48,1.72; p-value<0.001) for the HIV group, and 1.19 (95%CI = 1.14,1.23; p-value<0.001) for the non-HIV group and ( Table 1 ); the interaction with year as a categorical variable was also highly significant (p-value<0.001).
Weight was used as a proxy for body size and showed a highly significant correlation with length (r = 0.98; p<0.001).
The difference is highly significant (one-way ANOVA p<0.001), but the difference is small with disease genes having approximately 5% lower intron divergence than non-disease genes ( Figure 2a ).
(±145 SD) of young (open canopy) plantations; a difference which is highly significant (t = -826.5372, p ≤ 0.001).
When the two large groups of RP samples (benign RP-B and malignant RP-PCa) were compared with each other, most of the differences were statistically still highly significant (p≤0.001), except for RHOU , LMNB1 and PLA2G7 , indicating the stronger impact of detectable cancer tissue on biomarker expression patterns compared to likely field effects.
This effect is highly significant, chi 2 = 10.75, p = 0.001, and consistent with time pressure inducing more intuitive decision-making than time delay.
The difference in excess observed similarity between the groups is highly significant (p<0.001, rank test), which suggests that amino acid identity is a poor measure for estimating physicochemical similarity, and thus T cell cross-reactivity.
This was highly significant for the 5 and 15 mg/kg doses (p<0.001), which increased glucose levels by 24% and 69% compared to controls.
The risk-adjusted multivariate Poisson regression model also indicated that patients' preferred location was a highly significant predictor for family global satisfaction (p = 0.001; Table 3 ).
The minimum eccentricity of eyes-in-head at the start of a new saccade varies with posture, for sit M = 17.8°, for swivel M = 17.4°, and for stand M = 16.5°, a highly significant effect, F (2, 84886) = 192.9, p < .001, η G 2 = 0 . 0 0 5 , with significant pairwise differences between postures (all p ’s < .001).
In that study, a statistically highly significant (p<0.001) difference lasted for 4 hours without overlapping SEM values at any time point.
0.31, n = 13) for Alouatta , a highly significant difference (p<0.001, t test).