a small trendgold
While no significant differences were observed between conditions, a small trend toward lower α-DFA values with lower sampling frequencies lead us to recommend that data should be collected at around 120 Hz.
While no significant differences were observed between conditions, a small trend toward lower α-DFA values with lower sampling frequencies lead us to recommend that data should be collected at around 120 Hz.
The urban class showed an increasing trend throughout the study period (1985 to 2017) in both the scenarios.
The difference between data and model ( Fig 8c , circles) seem to be approximately constant in the White and Pink stimulus regimes, not showing a significant trend that follows the increase in input correlation.
It can be seen from the figure that there are cases reported in Guangdong every year in the years after 2014, and the number of cases in 2016-2018 shows an increasing trend.
decemlineata showed a trend toward decreased feeding preference of foliage treated with 16% CLA in aqueous suspension.
In the manuscript we refrain from making the statement of an observed trend and we will more simply write, “there was a trend toward decreased...”.
Fig 3 , “Proportion of tows with positive catch (points) and the probability of a positive catch modeled as a function of year (line) for each species where a significant trend in occurrence was observed,” is missing trend lines.
SPAD readings and leaves chlorophyll concentration We found a positive and significant exponential relationship between SPAD readings and leaves chlorophyll concentration for the factorial combinations NTxN0 (R 2 = 0.74); no significant relationship where found for both factorial combination RTxN0 (R 2 = 0.08) and CTxN0 (R 2 = 0.05) with, in the latter case, a negative trend (CTxN0: y = 1.6783e -0.007x ) ( Fig 2 ).
The former half of both curves show a rapid decline, but the latter half indicates an increasing trend.
Furthermore, the difference of the mean elastic fibers thickness between, WT (1,50 μm ± 0.26,) and MFS (MFS - : 1.14μm ± 0.34; MFS + : 1.15 μm ± 0.34) was highly significant (ρ<0,0001), while no difference was observed between MFS + and MFS - subgroups.
The 3D-EPI showed a trend of lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared to the SMS-EPI sequence, these differences were however not statistically significant neither for AR(1) (paired t-test with 9 degrees of freedom, p = 0.58 and t = 0.57 for the sensitivity; p = 0.44 and t = 0.81 for the specificity) nor for FAST (p = 0.91 and t = 0.12 for the sensitivity; p = 0.68 and t = 0.43 for the specificity).
Although these estimates are material in size and highly significant in statistical terms, aided by the very large samples, the overall probit regression only explains about 5% of the range of answers across individuals, and most of this is provided by the country fixed effects.
A P -value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference, while P < 0.10 was taken as a trend towards significance.
Mortality during 30-day follow-up was already markedly higher than in both other groups and these differences were highly significant after a one-year follow-up.
When looking at the absolute frequency of youth reporting violence exposure, females in schools with a lower FRLP showed a trend toward higher exposure proportions than males within that FRLP category.
In fact, we confirmed that GBE treatment (100 μg/ml) for 3 days ameliorated significantly neurite count (+79%), total neurite length (+75%), attachment (+138%) and endpoints (+64%) parameters and showed a positive trend to increase soma count and the extent of neurite branching compared to the untreated SH-SY5Y cells (Figs 3 and 4 ).
However, we only detected a marginally significant relationship between soil pH and average CH 4 flux ( Fig 6E ).
Our data showed a clear trend for the discrepancy in group differences for upright vs inverted faces, but the group difference was more pronounced in non-matched faces (see right panel of Fig 1 ).
A value of .05< = p >.0125 was considered to indicate a trend level of significance.
However, due to cellular heterogeneity, particularly for cancer cells, there might be significant genetic differences in these cells.
According to the Wilcoxon test there were no differences in mean tow duration between TED and CTRL trawls, except that TAR showed a barely significant difference of about 6 minutes ( Table 2 ).
coindetii showed a constant ratio close to 0.5 and a decreasing trend for larger individuals.
Cumulative IS incidence for the two targeted pollutants was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method ( S5 Fig ), presenting a clear trend of increased IS risk with increased each targeted pollutant exposure.
The medians of ESR-AD and ESR-PC exhibited an increasing trend from Group 1 (−17 and −33.3%, respectively) to Group 2 (−11 and −13%, respectively) to Group 3 (3.5% and 3.6%, respectively; P for trend < 0.001).
Finally, the push-off and lateral ankle mechanisms demonstrate a negative trend Stimulus Away (see Fig 2C and Table 2 ).