RASF showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) lower mean than OASF.
Excerpts
For the first node, there were seven possible pairs, and it was apparent that the majority of features were extremely significant between the normal person samples and the patient samples (N vs. rest, 57 features with p <0.001) among all these possible pairs.
The probability of a blenny switching to another species after being punished varied between 14.1%–71.4%, yielding overall highly significant differences between individuals (Chi 2 test, n = 560 observations on 6 blennies, Chi 2 = 227.8, df = 5, p<0.001, fig. 3 ).
In the Agilent platform (4x44k G4112F), 2 series, from which a total of 44 samples (N = 18, T = 26) were included in the final analysis A total of 8493 genes (up and down regulated) were identified from the analysis (FC>2.0; p <0.05); 338 of them being highly significant ( p <0.001) with high fold change differences (FC>25 fold).
In the analysis of plant height and leaf rosette diameter, most of the data sets did not pass the normality test and therefore Mann-Whitney U test was used to statistically evaluate the data and to confirm highly significant (p<0.001) difference between each of the two synthetic quintuple mutants and respective controls.
Reviewer Expertise The addition of the RE variable in model 2 represented a highly significant improvement over the baseline fit ( Table 3 ; χ 2 (1) = 36.8, p<0.001).
However, in the analysis of floret germination during three years by GLZ with multinomial model (three categories; germinated in the 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd year) the effect of site was not significant (Wald Statistics 0.8, p>0.05), while effect of floret position within a spikelet was highly significant (Wald Statistics 138, p<0.001).
The difference in daily change between the Control group and the ST Group is highly significant (p < 0.001).
While not all previously known DR variants were identified at genome-wide significance in our analyses, we observed an excess of nominally significant associations at these loci (p<0.001, Table B in S1 File ).
Despite the number of fibers outside the areas are highly significant (both P<0.001), injured BALB-neuT fits significantly better than injured BALB/c group (P<0.001), that is consistent with the enhanced function recovery seen for this group by means of grasping test.
The PUL scale showed highly significant loss of function at 12 months (p<0.001), with a mean drop in score of 9.2 (95% CI -11.9; -6.4) out of 74; this numerical result was predominantly driven by the loss of function in the shoulder domain.
For total similarity, the overall effect was highly significant (mean log odds ratio = 0.46, p < 0.001, 95% CI = [0.44; 0.48]), and Q statistic demonstrated that there was no heterogeneity between individual model coefficients.
The variability in diversity between study years was highly significant (P < 0.001).
Amplitude in supraliminal condition Within the supraliminal presentation mode, the difference between naked and dressed OSS was highly significant with greater amplitudes for naked bodies (t(18) = 5.33, p <.001, Fig. 3A,C ).
Panel regressions In panel regressions, WHO-estimated TB mortality declined around 1% faster in countries and years with ART coverage scale-up ( Table 1 , top), an effect that was highly significant (p<0.001) when considering TB mortality decline over years 1–3, 2–4 or 3–5 after onset of ART scale-up.
The overall improvement in model fit was highly significant (nested chi-square = 99.92, df = 6, p <.001).
Similar to the results for promoter-proximal RNAPII peaks, we found a significant trend for genes with high 3′ end stalling indices to have lower levels of nucRNA and RNAPII coverage in the gene body (p<0.001, Jonckheere-Terpstra test, Figure 5B ).
Statistically signifcant changes were classifed as signifcant (*) where p < 0.05, more signifcant (**) where p < 0.01 and highly significant (***) where p < 0.001 as compared with background group. 3.
Using an independent samples t -test, mean differences between groups were highly significant for all vascular disease risk variables ( p- values<0.001).
In the PCA analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure was 0.683, being classified as mediocre [ 37 ], with the Bartlett's Test of Sphericity being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
When removing this interaction effect from the random structure for Item and Subject, the effect became highly significant (estimate = -9.50, SE = 2.94, t = -3.23, p = 0.001).
The t-test was highly significant when comparing muriquis+tapirs vs. muriquis only (t = −4.5437, P<<0.001), muriquis+tapirs vs. tapirs only (t = −19.12, P<<0.001) and muriquis only vs. tapirs only (t = −15.37, P<<0.001).
In contrast, age exerted a highly significant effect at the first step for frequencies between 500 and 625 Hz (χ 2 = 14.2, p = 0.001).
There was also a directionally similar borderline significant difference between inverted faces and angry faces ( Mdn = 261.68 ms), Z = 2.50, p = .001, r = .30.
A decreasing trend was also noted for the rate of penetrating keratoplasty since 2008 (P < 0.001 using MARS).