Excerpts

Further, CRs of the RS-14 were between 18.427 and 29.099, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < .001).

F) is highly significant (p<0.001), indicating that it is a dominant confounding factor that prevents the factor Susceptibility from reaching statistical significance independently.

The P for trend in all models was also highly significant ( P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant association (P<0.001) between sex and place of tobacco use.

The infection intensity of coccidia had a highly significant effect on the infection intensity of nematodes ( P < 0.001, Fig 4-1 ), exhibiting a positive correlation coefficient of 0.187 ( P < 0.001).

Confidence intervals above 0.5 and highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive correlations were found for stimuli set 2 (Intensity-only) for both groups.

Generalized Linear Model A likelihood ratio test comparing the null and the full Generalized Linear Model was highly significant (χ 2 = 225, df = 7, P< 0.001) ( Table 5 ).

To assess whether intensity changes were associated with tempo effects on anticipation times, the effects of key velocity on anticipation times were partialled out, as before; the effect of tempo on residual finger anticipation times was still highly significant ( F (4,40) = 16.10, p <.001).

CP and C31cells previously incubated with mAbs against α2 or β1 subunits showed extremely significant reduced rates of adhesion to type 1 collagen in a 92% and 73% for CP; and in a 89% and 69% for C31, respectively (p<0.001); whereas mAbs against other important integrin subunits (α3, α5) did not change the adhesion rates significantly ( Figure 3A ).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences in mean finish time among pacing patterns ( F 3,78908 = 8012.1, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.233 ).

A highly significant extreme overall genetic differentiation was found among samples ( F ST = 0.716; p<0.001).

A statistically highly significant difference (p≤0.001) compared to 0 h p.i. was first detected after 8 h in S2 cells and after 24 h in Sf9 cells.

The difference between the two groups was found to be highly significant (p<0.001) as shown in Fig 4 [A] and Fig 4 [D].

The highly significant difference occurs in the surface soil (p<0.001), with the range of changes under drip irrigation being smaller than that under flood irrigation.

A statistically highly significant (p<0.001) difference in tumor ADC between baseline and follow-up measurement was found in the therapy group, where the median increased from ADC B = 0.782(±0.085)×10 −3 mm 2 /s to ADC F = 0.911(±0.121)×10 −3 mm 2 /s.

We found the most highly significant differences (P<0.001) in the mean abundance of reads belonging to the bacterial classes Actinobacteria, Thermoleophilia and Verrucomicrobiae in the GLS upstream mutants cyp79B3 , cyp79B2cyp79B3 and tu3 ( Fig 1D ).

Within-group analyses of the SCAS reports from pre to 12-month follow-up (see Fig 4 and Table 4 ) revealed large and highly significant improvements for all responders (adolescents: d = .99, p < .001; mothers: d = 1.10, p < .001; and fathers: d = .94, p < .001).

The differences between the values from the 3T3BXB-ER cells as well as the differences between 3T3 and 3T3BXB-ER cells were highly significant (p≤0.001), resulting in a decreased nuclear volume by ∼40% in estrogen treated BXB-ER cells.

In terms of participants’ beliefs about the importance of the country of origin of medications, we observed highly significant difference between the indices like ‘Effectiveness of the drug may vary depending on the country of manufacture or the identity of the manufacturer (P<0.001), ‘Locally produced generic medications are of high quality and can compete with western countries’ (P<0.001) and ‘the quality and effectiveness of locally produced generic medications is superior to that of the manufactured in other countries’ (P<0.1).

The risk-adjusted multivariate Poisson regression model also indicated that patients' preferred location was a highly significant predictor for family global satisfaction (p = 0.001; Table 3 ).

Despite these correlations, three of the variables were highly significant in the full model (P < 0.001), and excluding the two that were not (slope and mean temperature; P > 0.7) did not substantially change their coefficients or standard errors.

Finally, there was a highly significant difference in predation between the two sites ( site 1a and site 1b ) (gall predation: negative binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.05, SE = 0.44, z = −4.64, p<0.001; the incidence of gall predation: binomial GLMM, estimate = −2.25, SE = 0.31, z = −7.26, p<0.001; predation rate: quasibinomial GLMM, estimate = −2.13, SE = 0.26, df = 521, t = −8.30, p<0.001).

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant (p<0.001) differences among the genotypes for the nutrient and anti-nutrient composition except for percentage fat content ( Table 4 ).

juveniles, while differences between juveniles and adults were marginally non-significant (Tukey test; p < 0.001, p = 0.005 and p = 0.068 respectively).

(±145 SD) of young (open canopy) plantations; a difference which is highly significant (t = -826.5372, p ≤ 0.001).