Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Respondents from the COPD and Diabetes sub-samples had on average more co-morbid conditions than the NSA sub-sample (mean number of chronic conditions is 3.7 for the COPD sub-sample, 3.4 for the Diabetes sub-sample and 2.0 for the NSA sub-sample, with COPD/Diabetes difference significant (p = 0.010) and other differences highly significant (p<0.001)).
a decreasing trendp<0.0010.0× alphagold
Overall, there was a decreasing trend in δ 13 C oto over the last century (main Year effect p<0.001), with a larger decrease observed in Icelandic cod (mean values of δ 13 C oto decreased by 0.7‰ over the past 100 years) compared to NEA cod (mean values decreased by 0.3‰ over the past 100 years) ( Table 2 , Fig 3 ).
highly significantp <. 0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
‘perceived negative impacts of allocation mechanism’ have negative effects on ‘overall health professionals’ satisfaction’) had a positive coefficient of 0.29 for Kenya with a highly significant level of t (300) = 5.83, p <. 001 while path hypothesis 5 (i.e. ‘benefits of national health care resource allocation mechanism’ have positive effects on ‘overall health professionals’ satisfaction’) had a negative coefficient of -0.24 with a significant level of t (300) = -2.81, p <. 01.
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Increased vascular invasion score is associated with hormone receptor negative tumors Seven of the data sets had information on ER-status [8] – [11] , [13] – [15] , and six of the sets showed significant correlations between high signature score and ER-negative tumors, five of them highly significant (p<0.001).
extremely significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualified
CP and C31cells previously incubated with mAbs against α2 or β1 subunits showed extremely significant reduced rates of adhesion to type 1 collagen in a 92% and 73% for CP; and in a 89% and 69% for C31, respectively (p<0.001); whereas mAbs against other important integrin subunits (α3, α5) did not change the adhesion rates significantly ( Figure 3A ).