Statistical results with a p-value p<0.05 are considered as significant, such with p<0.01 as highly significant, and such with p<0.001 as very highly significant.
Excerpts
A two-tailed Student’s t-test indicated that the difference in total CFU was highly significant ( P <0.001).
A one-way ANOVA on these ratings disclosed a highly significant effect of emotion [ F (2, 34) = 39.94, p <.001, η p 2 = .701].
The PUL scale showed highly significant loss of function at 12 months (p<0.001), with a mean drop in score of 9.2 (95% CI -11.9; -6.4) out of 74; this numerical result was predominantly driven by the loss of function in the shoulder domain.
The mean TMT showed a highly significant correlation with CSA in both groups (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.733; p<0.001), as well as in the melanoma subgroup (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.692; p<0.001) and lung cancer subgroup (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.767; p<0.001) separately.
Age category was a highly significant predictor (p < 0.001), with negative regression coefficients indicating that higher age categories were associated with significantly lower odds of providing telehealth services.
In women however, even though the DCSI-CC score in the occupational sector “Health sector, social work, teaching and education” was among the lowest, there was a highly significant increase in the odds of having a higher DCSI-CC score in p4 compared to p1 (OR = 1,12, p<0,001) ( Fig 4 ).
Furthermore, the Pearson correlation analysis revealed highly significant (p<0.001) positive correlations of grain yield per plant with the yield components, 100 seed weight, number of seeds per plant, number of seeds per pod, and number of pods per plant at Sékou, Savè and across environments ( Table 5 ).
Whereas, BAFF serum levels (p = 0.06; wilks-lambda = 0.907) showed a statistical trend and CRP (p<0.001; wilks-lambda = 0.549) a significant difference at admission between patients with severe course (sNPoD) as compared to patients developing less severe disease (NP or EP).
Consistent with this finding, there was a very strong (Pearson r = -0.917) and highly significant (P<0.001) correlation between PiB binding (reflected by an increased standardized uptake value ratio) and impaired performance on the “Dots” and “Cubes” sections of the VOSP ( Figure 1C ).
For IS, assessing male and female combined, a decreasing trend of -3.84% was determined (CI: 95% [-4.52: -3.16]; p < 0.001).
The overall effect of generational cohort on the group of variables was highly significant (Wilk’s Lambda, df = 6, 284, F = 49.32, p < . 001 , partial eta squared = .510, a large effect size).
Table 4 shows that ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference (p = .001*) among the three groups of naswar users.
Also, a Spearman correlation between the number of empty responses collected at UFMG and the number of DKO/DKN/TOT responses collected at UFJF and UnB was highly significant ( r = 0.751, p < 0.001).
Remarkably, there was a highly significant correlation (Spearman’s rho = 0.95, p<0.001) between BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression in the 19 cell lines ( Table 1 ), suggesting that these genes are co-regulated in HNSCC, similar to what has been shown in mammary epithelial cells [35] .
The difference between the observed and predicted fluorescence levels was highly significant (p<0.001).
ANOVAs showed highly significant difference in environmental variation ( P <0.001) for all traits and most variations was due to treatment time of waterlogging, indicating strong environmental effects.
Landolt rings) yielded a highly significant main effect of Chart Type, F (1, 11) = 132.02, p <.001, but neither the main effect of Material nor the interaction approached significance (both p s>.20).
On the other hand, there was a highly significant improvement in PVF in the BCP group (p < 0.001), an effect that was significant compared to the PLA group (p = 0.012) or the unaffected limb of the same group (p < 0.001).
The overall correlations between EPS concentration and substratum stability were highly significant (stability - carbohydrates r = 0.728, n = 29, p<0.001; stability - proteins r = 0.414, n = 29, p<0.05); giving evidence of the important role of EPS for both, developing and reversing substratum stability.
The model predicted 32% of the variance and was highly significant (R 2 = 0.32, P <0.001).
pestis epidemics and suspected Black Death occurrences demonstrates a highly significant difference (p<0.001).
Force data at increasing cell-cell contact times for both MB231 and MB435 cells were extremely significant (p< 0.001) by single factor ANOVA.
Furthermore, Egger’s test statistics confirmed the presence of marginally significant publication bias at a P-value < 0.001 ( Table 4 ). 3.5.
There was a highly significant correlation (r = 0.99, p<0.001) between the area under the NPF shift curve and the proportion of defocus component in the adapting images (e.g.: 1 for PD and 0.50 for 50S/50D).