Excerpts

The linear regression of overall bacterial NMS axis 1 against arcsq-transformed % IC was highly significant (F 1,12 = 11.88, R 2 = 0.50, p -value = 0.005) ( Fig. 3 ).

If all the results are compared as a whole, we find that PLD2KO mice have a highly significant 5% more of the C36: species in all brain regions (see Fig 1G , p<0.005).

Three 5’ SNPs were moderately significant with dry AMD in the NESC, of which rs9309833 was the most significant (P = 0.005) ( Table 3 ).

Using band densitometry to compare relative expression levels, we found that, on average, signature envelope expression was 2.5-fold higher than non-signature envelope expression; the difference in signal intensity between the two groups was highly significant (p<.005).

This difference identifies a highly significant interaction between the two genes (Cox Proportional Hazards analysis; p = 0.005).

When evaluating the individual average contributions over all periods across PCC and FR, we find that there is a highly significant difference across these two treatments (Non-parametric Mann Whitney test, z = -2.791, p = 0.005).

However, the results remained highly significant (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.79; p = 0.005).

Patients with CDI + UC showed a trend of increasing relative abundance 3-mos. post-transplant (12.23, 95%CI 4.17 to 20.28, p = 0.005), but did not reach significance with the Bonferroni correction.

Linear polynomial contrast analysis showed a significant trend for IQ over the three groups (p = .005), with lowest IQs in SGA- children.

This reduction in tubule area proved highly significant ( P < 0.005), such that the mice treated with LH2Auristatin and FSH2Menadione/LH2Auristatin exhibited a 40% reduction in mean tubule area compared to the testes of the control group.

Corresponding Mann-Whitney U tests were highly significant (all p < 0.005), and these associations withstood adjustment for multiple testing.

Nevertheless, the effect of forest damage was highly significant in permutation-based ANOVAs for both DWA groups ( P = 0.005 in both cases).

Conversely in RA this percentage was higher in males than in females in both studies but the difference was highly significant here (p<0.005) but less so in Meyer and colleagues (p = 0.043).

The NS clonal line showed a significant effect of H 2 O 2 exposure on average number of tentacles present on days 5–12 (p<0.05), with highly significant effects on days 5, 11, and 12 (p<0.005).

Strikingly, GEN3 ( Figure 6A ) as well as primary PDC ( Figure 6B ) pulsed with flu-B cells induced a highly significant increase of IFNγ secretion by T cells, when compared to non-treated B cells (p<0,005, student t test).

A two-by two chi-sq test [(30, 19), (46, 95)] showed this difference to be highly significant (P<0.005; Figure 5 ).

However, when compared to DMSO, the inhibitions by P2, P6, P7 and P8 were highly significant ( p <0.005).

Importantly, the correlation remained marginally significant after introducing sex, age, years of education, neuroticism (N) and MWT-B verbal IQ as covariates (r = −.29; p = .005).

Product Use Correlations between saliva cotinine levels and number of cartridges/day were highly significant for study groups A and B, at week-6 (Rho = 0.90 for group A, p = 0.005; Rho = 0.74 for group B, p = 0.006, Spearman’s rank correlation) and at week-12 (Rho = 0.93 for group A, p<0.003; Rho = 0.95 for group B, p<0.0004).

The influence of different reading strategies on diagnostic performance was quite significant as Pearson Chi-square test indicated( X 2 = 16.725, p = 0.005).

The results of this model show no significant effect (p = 0.18; statistical power [95% CI] = 42.60% [39.51, 45.73]) of the rank on perseveration but there was a highly significant effect (p = 0.005) of centrality on perseveration, the most central individuals made less perseverative errors ( Fig 3 ).

The comparison of these changes in the walking test between the two groups was highly significant (p = 0.005, Mann-Whitney, two- tailed test). 8.

We identified 175 and 189 probe sets (genes) with highly significant strain differences (p<0.005, Benjamini-Hochberg multiple test correction) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively.

Regression analysis on colitis scores and fibrosis scores across all time points indicated a strong and highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.82, p <0.005).

These covariates were all highly significant (p<0.005), and accounted for 38.9% of variability in log e mean CIMT.