Excerpts

For parameter ‘duration’, microstates A, B, and C had significant correlations with the level of consciousness with a positive trend ( P < 0.01).

The difference between both the probability and subtraction model with four CPGs and the experimental values in the mean and median IPIs, and the IPI standard deviation was highly significant (P<0.01, Kruskal-Wallis Test, followed by Dunn's Multiple Comparisons Test, Table 1 ).

Specifically, Rhizobiales was the dominant bacterial order with the highest relative abundance under the three leguminous plant shrubs, presenting a significant trend of enrichment towards roots in all of the four rhizocompartments under leguminous plant shrubs ( P <0.01); Xanthomonadales also presented a significant trend of enrichment towards roots under leguminous plant shrubs ( P < 0.05).

S = 96.99 − 2.77 A + 2.51 B − 0.87 C + 1.08 A B − 0.86 A C + 1.15 B C − 1.17 A 2 − 0.59 B 2 − 1.46 C 2 (17) D = 5.30 − 0.39 A + 1.00 B − 2.52 C + 0.25 A B − 0.040 A C + 0.47 B C − 1.09 A 2 − 0.26 B 2 + 0.79 C 2 (18) Table 3 shows that the two regression models were highly significant ( P < 0.01), and the fitting degrees of the regression equations were high ( P > 0.05).

The average pairwise inter-laboratory difference for δ 15 N col values was 0.4‰ ( Table 3 , below diagonal), with highly significant differences among laboratories (ANOVA, F 19,76 = 19.3, p<0.01).

A number of genes, including PRKG1 , CNTN4 , and PRKCE , contained clusters of nominally significant SNPs (p<0.01): 17 SNPs in PRKG1 , 9 SNPs in CNTN4 , and 5 SNPs in PRKCE (see File S2 ).

For cognitive depressive symptoms, the unadjusted association was marginally significant, but it strengthened in the final adjusted model (β = 0.31, 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.56, p = 0.01).

Age and facial postures were highly significant (P<0.01, Table 1 ), and these two factors showed significant interaction (P<0.01).

In the group where the child’s nutritional status was normal, BAZ showed a significant trend according to maternal nutritional status ( p < 0.01).

The asterisks indicate a highly significant difference (p<0.01) between the test and control groups as analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

Highly significant correlations (p<0.01) were found between TC and PH, as well as KRN, and significant correlations (p<0.05) were found between TC and LNE, EL and NKR.

A highly significant correlation ( r = 0.907, p≤0.01) was found between the averaged ZSVs of the eight main recombinant genotypes determined in 2005-2006 and those in 2007-2008, suggesting that the genetic effects of the different Glu-3 genotypes on ZSV were relatively stable between the two years.

In the low risk group the preterm proportion was highest in the most deprived quintile (1.6% CI 95 1.4 to 1.8) with a significant trend towards a higher proportion of preterm births as deprivation increases (Chi square for trend p<0.01).

However, the 2 cell lines which showed only partial promoter methylation (MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468) showed highly significant (p<0.01) increases in HtrA1 expression levels.

Differences are considered non-significant (NS) when p ≥ 0.05, significant (*) when p<0.05, and highly significant (**) when p<0.01.

Significant differences were assumed at P<0.05 (*) and highly significant differences at P<0.01 (**).

There is a highly significant statistical connection between the number of people in waiting rooms and the energy equivalent sound level L Aeq (Spearman ρ = 0.485, p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant with p≤0.05 and highly significant with p≤0.01.

Between the two groups of maternal rats, there was a highly significant difference in Bifidobacterium (p <0.01).

A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between the amount of dissolved P and the pH (r = -0.925**, p <0.01).

Though all associations are highly significant (p<0.01 in the Kruskal Wallis Chi-square tests), the rate of increase across wealth groups varies.

This effect is substantial and statistically highly significant ( p <.01, d = .81).

85 out of 136 (63%) correlation coefficients ( N = 55185) were significantly positive, with 73 (54%) of the coefficients highly significant ( p < .001), 9 (7%) of those moderately significant ( p < .01), and 3 (2%) of those weakly significant ( p < .05).

The one-way ANOVA results and post-hoc Tukey HSD indicate a highly significant loss of CaCO 3 during the final month of exposure, after the onset of upwelling ( p <0.01; Table 3 , S1 Table ).

EndoNF treatment of C6-STX cells led to a highly significant reduction in cell migration (17% of control, P<0.01), but no effect on C6-WT or DLD-1 cells.