When we regressed GPA on the three future self-identification components, the overall regression model was marginally significant, F (3, 520) = 2.08, p = .10, R 2 = .01.
Excerpts
There was no significant correlation between the NAO WI in successive years, either in the whole of the period 1878–2015, or in the 23-year periods in which there were highly significant relationships between the NAO WI and the warmth sum (Ljung-Box tests, Q ≤ 2.6, P > 0.10 in all cases).
However, this correlation was only marginally significant (.05 < p <.10) Comment 16# The operational definition of “frozen signs” needs to be provided Response 16# We agree and to avoid misunderstanding of the reader, we replace frozen by lexical.
Improved muscle strength, balance, and proprioception developed and maintained during middle-age may be carried over when the individual gets older, aiding in the reduction of falls and fall-related injuries in the older adult population.[ 40 ] We observed an increasing trend (age- and gender-adjusted) in the rate of fall-related injuries from 2004 to 2013 among community-dwelling U.S adults (p <0.10, not statisically significant at 0.05 level) and, particularly, among older adults.
Positive immune responses to CDV HA were observed in 4 of 9 vaccinated dogs; a positive IFN-γ immune response to autologous tumor antigen was also observed in 1 dog and a trend towards significance (p<0.1) was observed in another 2 dogs.
Significance was set at **p<0.05, and results that approached significance *p<0.1 were also noted.
showed a trendp<0.1
Following the reversal learning (day 4), the APP23-scFvβ1 and WT-littermates showed a trend to reach the platform in shorter distance compared with both control APP23 groups (p<0.1) ( Figure 3D, E ).
a trend towards significancep = 0.1
β = 0.62, p = 0.003) and showed a trend towards significance in the separate study groups (ADPKD: St. β = 0.51, p = 0.1 and IgAN control: St. β = 0.76, p = 0.054).
All tests were two-sided and results that were statistically borderline significant at p≤0.1 (#) and significant at p ≤0.05 (*) and ≤0.01 (**).
For the perception that respondents are being supported by older relatives, CG was marginally significant only for Future generations ( p < 0.1).
showed a trendp <.10
The overall regression models were significant in eight cases and showed a trend ( p <.10) towards significance in another two cases.
For children up to 10 years, IgG OD responses increased significantly (p<0.05) with age for spike, while IgA OD responses to spike and RBD presented a marginally significant (p<0.1) increase with age ( Fig 2F ).
Next, significant variables or with marginal significance in univariate analysis (p < 0.100) were selected for multivariate analysis, trying to group those that were similar.
Statistical significance levels were set at p < 0.05, and marginal significance p < 0.1 [ 40 ].
In the shoulder condition there was only a tendency toward significance, F (2,27) = 2.81, p <.10, r = 0.41.
Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis of cancer-specific survival showed a trend towards significance in ER-negative patients (P<0.1) and was significant in triple negative patients (P<0.05).
An increased trend for inter-group connectivities was found for groups A; this increase is marginally significant (p<0.1) and could be interpreted as increased communicative activity within the higher-order executive control group that was induced by the cognitive load of deception.
The hypothesis rejection level for all tests was set at p < .05, and a notable trend was set at p < .1.
And the group differences of C net and E local at some K cost points were significant ( P <0.05, uncorrected) or marginally significant ( P <0.1, uncorrected).
Marginally significant variables with p<0.10 in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.
The effect of water addition on species richness was marginally significant ( P <0.1) depending on N treatments in the steppe but independent of N treatments in the old field ( Table 1 ).
Both ITT and LATE estimates indicate that a marginally significant (i.e., p < .10) proportion of HSAs and nurses/midwives in the treatment areas compared to those in the control areas reported visiting pregnant women in their catchment areas at least once during their pregnancy.
The interaction between SLM training and gender is also positive and marginally significant (β = 0.0.315, p < 0.1 ).
(e) There was marginally significant difference of CD44T expression according to N factors (p = 0.10), and CD44T expression was rather reduced in N2 factor.
Although it did not reach p<0.05 FDR corrected significance, there was a trend toward significance in the left lingual gyrus for the TIN>HL contrast as well (the region reached significance at p<0.1 FDR corrected).