A paired t -test comparing the accuracy of the participants in the first training session and the last training session (11 th session) showed a highly significant difference ( t (14) = 4.32, p <0.001), Figure 4 .
Excerpts
Monte Carlo simulations (SI Methods) revealed that this advantage in favor of animals was highly significant (accuracy: p = 0.001, median RT: p<0.0001).
Associations between pairs of rig within harbour arms were all highly significant (p≤0.001), indicating overlapping habitat use at the daily level.
Results Quantitative variation in biomass and related traits A highly significant variation (p < 0.001) was observed among genotypes for all agronomic traits each and across years (Tables 2 and 3 ).
The CFTR mRNA expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR, and, as shown in Figure 5A , Caco-2/pRS26 cells shows a highly significant (p<0.001) decrease in the CFTR levels (0.58±0.03 a.u.; mean ± SE; n = 10) compared to control cells (0.99±0.06a.u., n = 10).
A significant trend ( χ 2 = 70.328, P <0.001) was identified that showed a growing proportion of rural cases.
A simple computation reveals that, for n = 223, the Spearman rank correlation between the two sets of scores (the number of pairwise interactions won and the total sum of the number of points won) is ρ = − .45; it is negative and highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Statistical results with a p-value p<0.05 are considered as significant, such with p<0.01 as highly significant, and such with p<0.001 as very highly significant.
The results revealed that the variance due to genotype, environment, and G×E interaction was highly significant (P < 0.001) for all traits.
These differences were highly significant for lean against obese (0.85±0.04 vs 1.08±0.04 A.U., p = 0.001) as well as for lean against the T2DM group at baseline (0.85±0.04 vs 1.17±0.03 A.U., p<0.001).
Analysis of total extractable inositol phosphates in the ileal digesta by two-way ANOVA showed no significant effect of TiO 2 on the recovery of mixed inositol phosphates ( F 1 , 43 = 0.71, p = 0.4), whereas dietary treatment by way of inclusion of phytase was highly significant ( F 3 , 43 = 93.51, p < 0.001).
The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001).
Glucose consumption and lactate accumulation were strongly correlated with a negative trend in viability seen between 12°C and 37°C ( r = -0.784 and -0.700, respectively; P < 0.001 in both cases).
Intraindividual differences in both BMI and V VAT-T were highly significant (p<0.001).
Critically, the cross-over interaction between the Target Type and the Prime Type was highly significant, F 1 (2, 30) = 14.17, MS e = 44.37, p <.001; F 2 (2, 56) = 12.97, MS e = 63.49, p <.001.
The difference between the two hemispheres was highly significant (p<0.001, the paired t-test).
6B and 6A , respectively) there was a highly significant effect of treatment (SSE, DMSO control, medium control) (p<0.001); nematodes exposed to SSE displayed a shorter median lifespan than the respective DMSO and medium only controls.
7WD10 cells exposed to different concentrations of 2-CDA revealed highly significant reductions at 0.1 μM (39%, p<0.001), at 0.5 μM (30%, p<0.001), 1.0 μM (24%, p<0.001), 5.0 μM (19%, p<0.001) and 10.0 μM (29%, p<0.001) compared to untreated control cells ( Figure 7A & B ).
The three distinct groups of samples observed in the 2D PCA scatter plot were found to be highly significant in the discriminant analysis (Wilks’ lambda = 0.003; F 6,787 = 4628.199; P <0.001).
Results We found highly significant differences between the rings, i.e. distance of particle transport (F 1 = 14.29, p <0.001), particles, i.e. biochar types (F 1 = 36.73, p < 0.001) and a significant interaction term for ring and particle (F 1 = 2.51, p = 0.03) (see Table 1 ).
The reduction in the depression score from the first to the second visit (Wilcoxon signed test: V = 171.00, p<0.001) and differences between patients and controls were highly significant (Mann-Witney test; patients V1 and controls: U = 972.00, p<0.001; patients V2 and controls: U = 839.00, p<0.001).
Results We found that the condition in which the dogs were tested had a highly significant effect on how long the dogs manipulated the apparatus (LMM, N = 20, F 2,36 = 12.478, P≤0.001, Figure 3 ).
In the border area of the failing hearts, L6-HGF sheets again induced a highly significant increase of 109% and 59% in SMA-positive (2.66±0.29) and vWF-positive (0.78±0.05) tissue respectively (control SMA 1.27±0.29, vWF 0.49±0.07, p<0.001 for both; L6-WT SMA 1.69±0.15, p<0.01; vWF 0.64±0.05, p<0.05).
A significant trend ( P <.001) of increase in sharing of glass/bottle during training was observed.
Sentences (4) Mi sa che p [To me it knows that p], uncertainty EMP (b) As for sentence (4), the analysis revealed highly significant statistical differences χ 2 (2, N = 201) = 230.668, p < .001 concerning the EMPs selected by the participants.