All terms in the model were highly significant with p < 0.001.
Excerpts
A permutation test showed that the differences in the metabolic profiles between high and low VO 2max -subjects were highly significant (p<0.001).
In contrast, in the in vivo preovulatory-aged MII oocytes there was a highly significant decrease in the overall protein abundance of the cortical region and the spindle chromosome complex (Figs 3F and 4G ; Control: n = 41, PreOA: n = 120; p < 0.001).
Totally for all pair-wise comparisons of these homologous tissues, the average human-mouse difference was highly significant ( P <10 −3 ).
As a consequence, performance in Experiment 1.2 was worse near the lateral wall than along the corridor's midline: In contrast to Experiment 1.1, there was a highly significant main effect of lateral wall distance in Experiment 1.2 (F 1,30 = 32.38, p<0.001).
The increase in the mean levels of chromium in urine was highly significant from 0.29 μg/l before implantation to 3.19 μg/l at the time of explantation (p>0.001), considerably higher than the reference value of 0.6 μg/l.
The combined effect of altitude, mountain range, and selected soil chemical properties explained 27.8% of the total microfaunal compositional variation and was highly significant ( F = 3.0, P = 0.001).
No significant relationship was found between knowledge score and practice, but a highly significant association was found between fear scores and adhering to the health advisory and between fear scores and reporting mask-wearing (p < .001).
Both correlations were highly significant (p < 0.001).
When the variable exposure to violence at home was analyzed singularly in a simple logistic regression, the prediction was highly significant ( p = .001), but when the other factors were taken into account (see Table 3 ), exposure to violence was no longer a significant predictor.
On the testing day (day three), the DI was tested against chance level (50%) and it was found to be highly significant above 50% for both the control non-stressed mice (one-sample t-test, p<0.001) and the MR-tg non-stressed mice (one-sample t-test, p<0.001).
The statistical model was highly significant (F = 25.143, p < 0.001), suggesting that at least one predictor has a significant impact on mental health.
At 36 months, significant and borderline significant declines in qHBsAg, respectively, were noted in the group A (p<0.001) and in group B (p = 0.068) patients ( Fig 2B ).
After adjusting for the effects of potential confounding factors such as age, sex, hypertension, duration of diabetes, biochemical data, and cataract status, a significant trend was observed for all contrast conditions ( p for trend p < 0.001).
The difference is highly significant in a t -test. ***: P<0.001 (χ 2 test).
The statistical analysis of independent sample t-tests revealed that compared with the baseline YOLOv5s, all four key metrics of the improved model showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), and the large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 4.29–6.82) indicated strong practical significance.
Finally, the interaction effect between muscle group and body position was highly significant (F 1.592,30.256 = 16.078, P < .001, η p 2 = .458; Fig 3A2 ), and showed that the relationship between the response amplitudes differed between body positions.
This was evident by a highly significant reduction (p<0.001) in mean fluorescence detected during 6 h period ( Figure 3A ).
AMOVA results for overall population genetic structure within and among the populations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), except for ND1 gene results.
In women however, even though the DCSI-CC score in the occupational sector “Health sector, social work, teaching and education” was among the lowest, there was a highly significant increase in the odds of having a higher DCSI-CC score in p4 compared to p1 (OR = 1,12, p<0,001) ( Fig 4 ).
For Dim1 difference, the effect was highly significant (p < 0.001; estimate: –0.30; CI: –0.47 – –0.13).
As such, there was a highly significant effect among sites within exposure (F 4, 30 = 10.1, p<0.001) but no significant difference in overall density of colonies of Acropora spp. between exposures (F 1, 30 = 0.8, p>0.10).
Even controlling for stage, we observed a highly significant relationship between alpha power and sleep fragility (HR = 5.74, P <0.001).
Despite being highly significant, this relationship was very weak with an r of only 0.1 (PC1, r = 0.1, p<0.001, Fig. 4B ).
The difference between the areas under the curves of the WT and Hvcn1 -/- cells was highly significant (p<0.001).