Excerpts

In this context, all correlations except for Chinese and Russian are strong and highly significant (at p < .001 or better).

Moreover, small-seeded soybeans germinated under light conditions showed highly significant differences ( p > 0.001).

The difference between groups was highly significant (t 14 = 7.1, p<0.001).

p > 0.1) or highly significant (e.g. p < 0.001).

However, in the Netherlands a very strong and highly significant opposite effect was present, i.e. much more females than males thought women are better due to childcare (χ2(1) = 11.6, p < .001, V = .477).

once daily for 7 days, offered highly significant ( P <0.001) protection against mortality in the AG129 mouse TCRV infection model, without appreciably reducing viral burden.

Among those older infants that were stratified as HR, only 66.9% had an LP performed which is highly significant compared with the infants less than 30d old (p<0.001).

Furthermore, in a two-factor ANOVA, the interaction of carcass rates with capture method and period was highly significant (F 2,306 = 227.23, MSE = 0.109, p < 0.001), as mean carcass rates increased for both trap and shotgun over the Early and Pre-ban periods, but only increased for shotgun Post-ban ( S1 Fig ).

The AUROC of the ELISA/HA model was significantly higher than that of the ELF model, whilst improved performance of the ELISA model approached significance (p<0.001 and p = 0.054 respectively, DeLong’s test, Table 3 , Fig 2 ).

The obese PCOS women were significantly more frequent in the <18 and >20 CAG repeat category than the lean PCOS women, yielding a highly significant odds (p = 0.001).

The collapsed data revealed a highly significant group×prime type interaction ( F (2,148) = 23.9, P <.001).

Highly significant correlations were found between the three SGI chronologies ( p < 0.001; 0.55 < τ < 0.68) of all specimens.

Flow rates for 25-gauge HVs increased with increases in US power, although the trend was not significant ( P = 0.41), and showed a significant trend for increased flow rate with increased aspiration levels ( P < 0.001).

In the left superior parietal lobe (SPL), a marginally significant (at whole brain P <.001 uncorrected ) positive interaction for synaesthetes was found for the contrast of the collapsed synaesthesia CC and IC conditions, compared to the collapsed colour CC and IC conditions (see Table 3 ).

Correlations between MoCA raw values and scores in the CDR domain memory as well as between CDR global and CDR SOB scores were highly significant (p < 0.001 for memory (rho = -0.711) as well as CDR global (rho = -0.605) and CDR SOB (rho = -0.600)).

The Monte Carlo test with permutations of the coordinates of each point (plot) indicated that the separation between the types was highly significant (P < 0.001) and explained 36.8% of the variance between the types ( Fig 3 ).

When we analyzed TCs and controls separately, we did not only find a highly significant reduction in sRAGE but also in esRAGE levels (sRAGE 188.6±40.5 vs. 364.8±28.6; p = 0.001; fig. 7(c) ; esRAGE 334.6±35.7 vs. 412.9±21.3; p = 0.023; fig. 7(d) ).

Effect of educational level was homogeneous and highly significant for all tests ( p< 0.001) and for this reason it is not presented.

The results from the SEM indicate a good model fit; the chi-squared ( χ 2 ) value was highly significant ( p < .001), as were the values of the goodness-of-fit index (GFI; 0.94), the comparative fit index (CFI; 0.92), and the mean square error of approximation (RMSEA; 0.012), which implies that the model fits the data well.

A highly significant positive correlation was observed between the numbers of reported cases and absent students under school closure ( r = 0.964, p < 0.001).

Leading to a correct classification of 83.8% of cases (95.1% of cases without and 53.3% of cases with UHR criteria), the model became highly significant (Omnibus test: χ 2 (3) = 38.883, p<0.001) and explained 39.2% of the variance ( Table 5 ).

A decreasing trend was also noted for the rate of penetrating keratoplasty since 2008 (P < 0.001 using MARS).

A highly significant correlation between AREG and EREG mRNA expression was observed (Spearman ρ 2 = 0.736, p<0.001 ).

For example, for 614 isolated spinal vertebrae, correlation was highly significant (p<0.001; r = .704).

On assessment of the unadjusted associations we selected 35 which were highly significant (P<0.001).