We found that the main effect of grade was nonsignificant but the main effect of numerosity was highly significant ( F (3.49, 164.16) = 395.02, p<.001, power= .99).
Excerpts
MEG Data Emotionally significant pictures elicited a larger visual evoked activity than did neutral pictures ( Figure 1b , 2b with { neg , neu , pos } = {1; −2; 1} being highly significant, F (1,18) = 25.003; p<.001.
The differences in CBSV infection among cassava varieties was highly significant (ANOVA, F 2,6 = 24.1, P<0.001).
For Bio-PC1, 43 SNPs were identified ( p < 0.01), of which 11 were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and three remained significant after adjustment for multiple testing ( q < 0.05) ( Fig 4A , S3 Table ).
In contrast, species differences in the proportion of aphids that fell from the host plant as a result of chill coma were highly significant (χ 2 2 = 20.80 p<0.001), with significantly more M. dirhodum falling from the plant as a result of chill coma, and significantly less R. padi than expected (relative proportions for M. dirhodum , R. padi and S. avenae are 0.45, 0.02 and 0.21 respectively).
As could have been expected from the significant among-population differentiation, there was a strong, highly significant isolation by distance observed both at the level of the entire species (Mantel test, r = 0.89, P <0.001) and within genetic clusters (North: r = 0.78, P <0.001; South: r = 0.78, P <0.001) ( Fig.
NKs and MCs alone had a highly significant intrinsic ability to kill infected cells ( Figure 4A , no serum/effectors compared to effectors + control serum, P < 0.001) whereas PMNs showed a modest but insignificant trend to intrinsic killing (no serum/effectors compared to effectors + control serum P > 0.05).
Although the association of eGFR with LDL-C lost significance after further adjustment, the associations of eGFR with apoC-III remained highly significant in the fully adjusted model that also accounts for urinary ACR (p = 0.001).
After correction, the association between ARSSS and baseline viral load remained highly significant (p<0.001).
Furthermore, there is a significant difference (P<0.01) between samples of different culture days (3 and 5 days) and a highly significant difference (P<0.001) between the culture at 3 and 7 days (supplementary data), which could be as a result of disturbance at the initial stage of the culture due to extracellular membrane adhesion protein synthesis [ 29 ].
However, the difference in days admitted stayed highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating a robust finding of a longer duration of hospital stay for the Single-J compared to the Double-J, see also S2 and S3 Tables .
pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (F IT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001).
Furthermore, sperm viability and organelle functionality showed a decrease after thawing, displaying highly significant differences between 0 and 2 hours post-thawing: YOPRO-1-/PI-, t(32) = 11.47, p<0.001; MT+, t(32) = 6.26, p<0.001; and PNA-, t(32) = 11.18, p<0.001 ( Table 2 ).
P<0.05 was considered significant and marked as *, P<0.01 as highly significant and marked as **, and P<0.001 was very highly significant and marked as ***.
Using this median number as the cut-off point, 27 patients with FZD3 ICC score > 321.5 and 8 patients with FZD3 ICC score ≤ 321.5 had recurrent or metastatic CRC after follow-up for 42 months and the association between FZD3 ICC scores and recurrent or metastatic CRC was highly significant (Chi-square test: χ 2 = 13.34; P < 0.001).
A one-way analysis of variance revealed a highly significant difference in unconfined compressive strength among the treatment groups (F = 811.95, P < 0.001).
A highly significant main effect of Stimulus Type was also observed ( F (1,67) = 288.092, p < .001, η p 2 = .81), with a higher mean frequency of switches in the feature condition ( M = 7.53, SEM = .26, 95% CI [7.00, 8.05]) compared to the conjunction condition ( M = 2.29, SEM = .25, 95% CI [1.79, 2.79]).
Noninferiority was detected for all four outcomes; one-tailed superiority tests for each outcome were highly significant at P<0.001 in the expected directions.
The brake was further evaluated in more complex models comparing models without the brake (models 3–4, table 2 ) to models with the brake (models 5–6, table 2 ) suggesting increased fit and a highly significant deviance in favor of the “brake” function comparing the best fitted models (6d & 4d) (chi2 = 67, df≈2, p<.001).
By POD70, cochlear ablation resulted in a highly significant (ANOVA, p<0.001) areal reduction of 0.66 on the affected side, or a shrinkage by 34%.
This reveals a highly significant difference between the Sr/Ca-ratio means (p<0.001) of the gladiators and the NG inhabitants ( Table 5 ).
GmHsp 21.3 exhibited the highest fold change in diapause individuals which was highly significant (t = -35.74, df = 8, p < 0.001), and together with five other genes showed upregulated expression during diapause.
Pre-registered hypotheses The morality-only model of partisan prejudice was highly significant, F (5, 1045) = 40.76 .13, p < .001, and explained 16% of the variance in partisan prejudice.
Our mixed models confirmed highly significant differences between the groups consistent across all minutes of both tests for “duration in mirror zone” (LMM, F 19,31794 = 210.968, p<0.001) and “distance moved in mirror zone” (LMM, F 19,29287 = 159.298, p<0.001).
This difference was highly significant (p<0.001; n = 4 independent experiments).