Excerpts

With respect to its role in differentiating between necrotic and viable tumor regions, a feature was deemed highly significant if P < 0.001, significant if 0.001 ≤ P < 0.05, and not significant if P ≥ 0.05.

Bleaching response among sites at the onset of the bleaching event was compared using an unbalanced GLM, which gave highly significant (p<0.001) main effects of site and taxa, and site-taxa interactions ( Table 2 ).

We found highly significant ( P < 0.001) genetic differentiation among the ten mountains, with the strongest divergence between the Simen Mts and Mt Elgon ( Fig 4 ).

Comparing pyramidal-like CA1 and CA3 ESN morphology to type B ESNs (live after 28 DIV), revealed highly significant differences between the two groups ( Fig. 1D ; p<0.001).

For both parameters, we could confirm a statistically highly significant correlation between the PLR and CRP/fibrinogen (p-value of <0.001; for PLR>150 and CRP: Pearsońs r = 0.3; Spearmańs rho = 0.2; for PLR>150 and fibrinogen: Pearsońs r = 0.4; Spearmańs rho = 0.3).

Table 5 presents genome-wide significant and Figure 2 nominally significant results ( P <0.001) of a meta-analysis of the discovery sample and the replication sample.

The ANOVA results ( Table 3 ) indicate that among the investigated process parameters, layer thickness has the most significant influence on flexural strength, contributing approximately 89.17% of the total variation with a highly significant effect (p = 0.001).

A similar pattern of results was found for the measure of avoidance latency, with a highly significant two-way interaction, F (12,164) = 3.0, p = .001, reflecting poorer acquisition curves in the 50 and 100 Hz groups relative to the 20 Hz and no stimulation groups ( Figure 2 , middle panel).

In the 100-item versions, highly significant inversion effects were evident on both our new tasks: Emotion-matching (upright: M = 77.59, SD = 7.64; inverted: M = 68.28, SD = 6.88; t (96) = 4.75, p <.001) and Emotion-labelling (upright: M = 83.10, SD = 6.87; inverted: M = 67.50, SD = 9.84; t (96) = 7.99, p <.001).

There is a highly significant (p≤ 0.001) association between family size and workforce size; cultivated land area and average production yield; amount of organic fertilizer and average production yield.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.71, above the recommended value of 0.60 [ 127 – 129 ], and the Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant (1852.64, p < 0.001), indicating that PCA is appropriate for this dataset [ 114 – 116 , 118 , 130 ].

Even though it is based on just 20 cases, it is highly significant (p <.001) but with a wide confidence interval (3.0–53.0).

The risk-adjusted multivariate Poisson regression model also indicated that patients' preferred location was a highly significant predictor for family global satisfaction (p = 0.001; Table 3 ).

In line with this result, we found a highly significant positive correlation between gain and minimum position error at fast speed (r = .65, p = .001), suggesting a tradeoff between high pursuit gain and low minimum position error.

In Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO), KMO metric for sampling sufficient degree was 0.784, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity showed extremely significant difference (P<0.001), the selected factor is suitable.

Results Combined analyses for traits recorded under stressful and non-stressful conditions Highly significant (p < 0.001) differences were detected among environments, hybrids, and parental lines for grain yield (GY), days to anthesis (DA), days to silking (DS), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH) across Striga-infested ( Table 1 ), Striga non-infested ( Table 2 ), and combined drought and heat stress (DHS) ( Table 3 ) conditions.

Heatmaps were constructed to enable visualization of data for the top 25 highly significant compounds that had large changes in abundance in dogs with sepsis at the lowest P-values <0.001 ( Fig 2C ).

This difference in LTI was confirmed in the ANCOVA, where a highly significant group effect (F 2,29 = 10.3, p<0.001) was detected; this factor alone accounting for >40% of the total variance.

There was a highly significant main effect of phase, F (1, 52) = 51.64, p <.001, η p 2 = .50, indicating that participants committed more errors during the reversal phase ( M = 10.6, SD = 6.9) than the acquisition phase ( M = 2.9, SD = 2.7) ( Figure 1 ).

The log-rank test for equality of survival curves was highly significant at P = 0.001.

The difference is highly significant (χ 2 = 54.78, df = 1, P<.001) ( Table 1 ).

pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (F IT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001).

The difference was highly significant ( P <0.001) between the age- and gender-matched stroke subgroup and the control group.

When we analyzed TCs and controls separately, we did not only find a highly significant reduction in sRAGE but also in esRAGE levels (sRAGE 188.6±40.5 vs. 364.8±28.6; p = 0.001; fig. 7(c) ; esRAGE 334.6±35.7 vs. 412.9±21.3; p = 0.023; fig. 7(d) ).

Interferential statistics proved a highly significant change with a very large effect size (ǀ d ǀ = 1.7; p < 0.001).