ovata populations was marginally significant ( p = 0.021) but not significant in E. pauciflora ( p = 0.152).
Excerpts
Similarly, selection tests performed at sites [MEME (Mixed Effects Model of Evolution)] did not detect evidence of positive selection at any site across the sequences of the Bdhn genes except for two significant or marginally significant positions in genes Bdhn 1- Bdhn 2 (site 139, p = 0.04; site 163, p = 0.02) and two in Bdhn 6 (site 266, p = 0.04; site 412, p = 0.05) ( Supplementary Materials S1 ).
Analysis by two-way ANOVA revealed marked phenotype effects (F2,45 = 25.5, p -value ≤ 0.001), no strain effects (F2,45 = 2.64, p -value = 0.08), and a marginally significant interaction (F4,45 = 2.74, p -value = 0.04).
However, the correlation was marginally significant ( r = 0.19, p = 0.04) ( Figure 7 B), while no correlation was observed with longitude for HSW ( r = 0.17, p = 0.06).
uliginosum showed a marginally significant decrease in AQY (−16.1%; p = 0.044), while no changes in AQY were observed for Rh. confertissimum across the whole growing season ( Table 2 and Table 3 ). 2.4.
On the other hand, we detected a significant difference in ACM on 14th day between isolates of different genera (χ 2 (2) = 18.423, p = 0.0001), isolates isolated from a meadow versus a field (F 1,57 = 7.182, p = 0.0096), and marginally significant differences in ACM of isolates from an adult insect host versus larvae (χ 2 (1) = 4.0098, p = 0.0452) and from a Lepidoptera insect host versus a Coleoptera (χ 2 (1) = 4.1391, p = 0.0419). 2.3.
The average F ST value across populations was slightly higher in the TIL ( F ST = 0.103) region than in the ZA ( F ST = 0.092) region, yet this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.046).
Drought stress also impacted leaf length, with control plants exhibiting longer leaves compared to drought-stressed ones, although the difference was only marginally significant (F 2,12 = 3.796, p = 0.048).
Highly significant values were ranked based on p -values after Bonferroni correction (at p = 0.05).
According to Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, PE14 (43 ± 20%) showed a highly significant reduction in viability compared to the control and nearly all other extracts ( p < 0.05 to p < 0.001).
Pathogenic fungi, in contrast, showed highly significant reductions in both total cohesion and positive cohesion ( p < 0.05, Figure 5 F) and a significant increase in negative cohesion ( p < 0.05).
p < 0.05 (*) indicated the presence of a statistically significant difference, p < 0.01 (**) was considered highly significant, and p > 0.05 meant no significant difference. 2.3.
Effects of Si on the Root Phenotypes ANOVA analysis ( Table 2 ) showed that Si treatments had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.05) on all measured root traits, including TRL, AD, RV, number of tips, SA, and number of forks.
There was a slight trend towards lower g s and Tr in plants at elevated CO 2 in May and June; however, elevated CO 2 did not affect both physiological parameters at p < 0.05 in these two months.
Comparison of Agronomic Traits Among Different Oat Varieties There were highly significant differences in plant height among various oat varieties at the harvest stage ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 2 a).
showed a trendp < 0.05
The relative abundance of Neocosmospora showed a trend opposite to the above three genera in cucumber root ( p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 G). 3.
Foliar spraying resulted in highly significant differences ( p < 0.05) between herbicide treatments at all monitoring times ( Table 4 ).
The statistical significance of the results was determined using Student’s t -test; differences were considered to be significant and highly significant at p < 0.05 (*) and p < 0.01 (**), respectively.
As compared to S plants, seed hormonal priming was able to decrease Yloss by 8%, 4%, and 21%, respectively, in S-P-IAA, S-P-GA 3 , and S-P-SA plants under salinity stress (differences are relatively significant for S-P-IAA and S-P-GA 3 as compared to S, p < 0.05, and highly significant for S-P-SA as compared to S plants, p < 0.05; Figure 2 e).
Effects of Different Treatments on the Oil Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Pecan Kernels In terms of oil content ( Figure 6 A), only the L3B treatment was significantly higher than CK ( p < 0.05), with an oil content of 57.43% and an increase of 16.78%; the remaining treatments, although all showing an increasing trend, did not differ significantly from CK ( p > 0.05).
In comparison, Tr and Ci demonstrated lower sensitivity to Cs treatment, while Gs displayed a decreasing trend with increasing Cs concentration (20.62–40.73%, p < 0.05) ( Figure 3 B–D).
Expression level of HKGs in 2nd bud showed in Figure 6 and Figure 7 was significantly ( p < 0.05) decreased gradually after one and two days treated of bare roots condition which showed lower vitality of buds, and clearly significant ( p < 0.05) decreased after three-days of treatment which exposed lower survival of the seedlings.
In particular, Cu was the only mineral that exhibited a marginal significance (0.01 < p < 0.05) in relation to the plant part and LxP variation, with no significant result observed for harvest location.
Four compounds of the secondary metabolism of plants showed significant or marginally significant changes in response to Pc ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.10, respectively; Table 4 ).
A highly significant, positive correlation ( p ≤ 0.05) of TPC was observed with TFC ( r = 0.96).