Excerpts

However, there was a negative trend between bone PFOS concentration and relative bone volume (Fig. 2C , r = 0.45, p = 0.06).

Twenty-one donors with resolving hepatitis did not differ significantly from 19 donors with chronic infection with respect to age, but the proportion of females in the former group was higher and close to being statistically significant (37% vs 10%; p = 0.06).

5E ) sc-inulin fed mice showed a decreasing trend in the levels of chenodeoxycholic (CDCA, P = 0.06), deoxycholic acid (DCA, P = 0.06) and higher level of β-muricholic acid (β-MCA, P = 0.08, Fig. 5E ).

Among non-microscopic surgeons, satisfaction after SMILE was greater than with contact lenses ( p = 0.001) and showed a trend versus spectacles ( p = 0.060).

Results showed that MMP-3 was associated with breast cancer risk only in part of Native Americann, with merely borderline significance ( P = 0.06).

The ToM → EC model had the smallest AIC (2180.92, all other models > 2182) and SABIC (2182.69, all others > 2184), along with a marginally significant Chi-square difference test result ( p =.06).

The Pearson correlations approached significance for the young insulin sensitive and resistant groups (r = 0.12, p < 0.060).

evaluated well-being using the general health dimension of the health questionnaire (SF-36) and found a borderline significant difference between the intervention and control groups (p = 0.06).

Conversely, leopards showed an almost significant negative effect on chacma baboon activity at dawn (β = -1.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.06; Fig. 5 B).

We applied our own criteria to the case of Peng, Chen and Yang 17 and found a marginal significance ( t = − 1.91, df = 53, P = 0.06) between fencing and grazing.

For the non-microscopic surgeon group, SMILE satisfaction was significantly higher than contact lenses (Z = −3.235, p = 0.001), though the difference with glasses approached significance (Z = −1.884, p = 0.060) (Table 6 ).

Tissue fraction showed marginal significance ( p = 0.06), suggesting that its variable composition can influence efficiency under certain operating conditions.

Absolute standardized discordance (| d |), however, did not depend on F tissue (GAMM: F = 0.075, p = 0.786), while our data suggest that it may be related (with marginal significance) to trout density (GAMM: F = 3.781, p = 0.060; Table 2 ), with lower discordances associated with higher trout density (Fig. 3 B).

However, we deem this prospect unlikely due to the subtle visual differences between ‘eyes open’ and ‘eyes closed’ conditions, and the reported lack of difference between the ‘eyes open’ and ‘half looking’ conditions, as well as the ‘eyes closed’ and ‘not looking’ conditions (although the later relationship was approaching significance ( p = 0.06 ) and would likely be significant in a more powered study).

The correlation between SKP2 protein levels and IC50 values showed a positive trend (Pearson r = 0.7767), with a p-value near significance ( p = 0.06), (Supplemental Fig.

Effect of lateralized motor impairment The repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of compatibility, F (2,26) = 9.79; p = 0.002; η 2 = 0.43 and the three-way interaction approached significance, F (4,52) = 2.48; p = 0.06; η 2 = 0.16.

The main effect of outcome frequency (50% and 80% error rate conditions) was marginally significant ( F 1, 23 = 3.91, p = 0.06), showing that slower RT in the 50% (840 ± 20 ms) than in the 80% (833 ± 20 ms) error rate condition.

One-year follow-up Fibroid recurrence rates showed a trend toward lower rates in the 3D model group compared to the control group (1/55 [1.8%] vs. 7/55 [12.7%]; P = 0.060), approaching but not reaching statistical significance.

Instead, we find a marginally significant effect in the opposite direction—people select the aesthetic target on Trial 1 marginally more often b = −0.21, SE = 0.11, t = −1.90, p = 0.06.

Interaction between sub-treatment and CL was marginally significant ( χ 2 1 = 3.52, p = 0.06).

However lack of UIP/NSIP pattern on histopathology was marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The interaction term for assessment of risk heterogeneity across sex was marginally significant in rectal cancer ( p = 0.06).

While we found that the ratio of brain volume to ICV is not significantly different overall, there is a possible trend ( p = .06) which further analysis showed to be primarily among men ( p = .08) compared with women ( n = .4).

There was a marginally significant, positive correlation between MHI and dock abundance in 2000 (Table 5 , χ2(1) = 3.54, p = 0.06).

Although insulin levels showed a trend toward reduction, the difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.06).