Excerpts

A borderline significant inverse association was observed while comparing parity with nulliparous, with summarized RR = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60–1.06; I 2 = 90.9%, P < 0.001).

Results Genetic and multivariate variation among families The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) among families for all measured traits (Table 1 ), confirming substantial genetic variability within the Pusa Srijan-derived population.

The expression pattern of MTR_1g072320 matched that obtained in the Vf6 × zt2 RILs, showing highly significant differences in the expression level ( p < 0.001) between the contrasting FC genotypes.

For all the miRNAs, there was highly significant interaction (p ≤ 0.001) between the genotype and environment suggesting the contrast in the expression of the above cluster of miRNAs was result of drought-mediated differential response of tolerant vs sensitive cultivar (Supplementary Table S3 ).

Inter-subject correlations were significant for all categories, with the exception of ‘engaged’, which was approaching significance: distracted, t(1860) = 3.57, p < 0.001, n = 1861; reflecting, t(2374) = 2.79, p = 0.005, n = 2375; engaged, t(2591) = 1.51, p = 0.13, n = 2592); immersed, t(1824) = 3.23, p = 0.001, n = 1825.

Root length density of cover crop variants The ANOVA results revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of the CC variants and year on the RLD at 0–60 cm and the top 0–10 cm at RUZ and LUK, whereas the effect was not significant at subsoil depths of 40–50 and 50–60 cm.

Regarding spillovers, W × Ln RHI is positive and highly significant (b = 0.2455, p < 0.001), indicating that higher Ln RHI in neighboring provinces is associated with higher CCD (D) in the focal province.

A highly significant positive correlation was identified between N:P ratios and aquatic plant cover in Lake Taihu (p < 0.001), reflecting their synchronous temporal dynamics.

The analysis of variance (Table 3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between accessions in all assessed quantitative agronomic characteristics.

A highly significant difference among treatment groups ( p < 0.001) was observed (Fig. 4 ).

Wearing a glove leads to a highly significant increase of force reduction from 61.6 N/s in the baseline condition to 89.5 N/s in the glove condition (PostHoc: t (21) = − 6.8, p < 0.001, d = − 1.5, BF 10 > 100).

Comparing patients based on sarcopenia according to the above-mentioned classification revealed a highly significant difference in median OS of 34.5 vs. 10.3 months ( p < 0.001) but no significant difference according to cPFS (27.7 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.354) or sPFS (17 vs. 8 months, p = 0.35).

However the effect size was much smaller than the highly significant influence of mask type ( χ 2 (1) = 68.85, p < 0.001).

Results The analysis revealed a highly significant difference overall RMSE between the two response Methods (F(1,18) = 22.96, p < 0.001).

Suppression of TNFα or IL-1β was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant variations were observed in the IWDSs among the genotypes ( F = 169.9; df = 257; P > 0.001 ) and genomic groups ( F = 637.9; df = 6; P > 0.001 ) tested.

One-way ANOVA results in Table 17 reveal highly significant differences across methods (F-statistics 156.92–312.45, all p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.82–0.91), with Tukey HSD post-hoc tests confirming the proposed method’s superiority over all baselines.

The adequacy of correlations between items was highly significant (Table 2 ; BTS: χ2 = 2875.494, df = 55, p < 0.001).

MGEs were also significantly associated with ARGs (M2 = 0.695, P = 0.024) and showed a highly significant correlation with MRGs (M2 = 0.601, P < 0.001).

For MFCC2 with fmax = 12 kHz, there was a highly significant effect of gender (males were higher, p <0.001) and a significant effect of dataset (CLAC values were lower, p <0.05) with no significant effect of age.

Although these methods had a lot in common in highly significant MTAs, there was a difference between the methods in terms of significant SNPs at the level of − log 10 ( p ) > 3.

In both cases, this decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) enrichment of CSF tracer in the subarachnoid space (SAS) adjacent to the straight gyrus with peak enrichment after 3–6 h (Fig. 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).

A one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the concentrations of both α-chaconine and α-solanine and across the three sampling intervals (30, 45, and 60 days).

15,16, where loading velocity and absorbed energy showed a positive and highly significant relationship (R2 = 0.69, p < 0.001, N = 34) (Fig. 1 ).