Assessing the association of individual metabolites of these factors with TJA revealed a highly significant association between Fatty Acid Chain Length (FALen) and Any OA or TJA (P < 0.001).
Excerpts
We also observed a highly significant reduction (30% compared to controls p < 0.001) in the ability of hearing impaired individual’s ability to detect cooling which was not accompanied by changes in warm detection.
2 - black circle’s departure from the diagonal) was also highly significant (p < 0.001).
The results were considered significant at * p < 0.05, very significant at ** p < 0.01 and extremely significant at *** p < 0.001.
Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Student's t test was used in the analysis indicated by the figure legends (*P < 0.05, significant; **P < 0.01, highly significant; ***P < 0.001, extremely significant).
While season showed marginal significance (GLMM: χ 2 (1) = 15.69; p < 0.001), its effect was most pronounced in interactions.
The results show that the recorded neural activity during the day preceding and following each peak day was highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) indicating a rapid switch in activity within the tumor on the peak days.
The mean IL-6 levels at baseline, after 24 and 48 h, were significantly higher in Group 1 compared to the other groups, with a decreasing trend observed in Group 1 ( p = 0.001) and Group 2 ( p = 0.004).
In contrast, a highly significant decrease of metabolically active cells was observed for polyamide + vas + CMC and polyester + gly (p < 0.001).
An increasing trend was observed in CO data until the 16th h (P < 0.001), and then CO dropped significantly below the level of the sham-operated animals at the 20th h (P < 0.001).
In this analysis, the year effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001), but showed a weak relation to effects of management strategy ( P > 0.05).
The average relative abundance of Pseudomonadota in the 9 sediment samples exceeds 15%, but the difference among the collapsed lakes is extremely significant ( p < 0.001).
Chi-square tests reinforced these categorical relationships, with highly significant results for substance use (χ 2 = 14.2, p < 0.001) and social support (χ 2 = 18.9, p < 0.001).
The deviation from equal proportions was highly significant (χ 2 = 25.33, df = 1, P < 0.001).
These values are highly significant ( P < 0.001) when compared to the percentage of cells attached to tubules during the first time-lapse of the video (2 hours).
Subsequently, we identified highly significant ( P < 0.001) levels of hypoxia score across 13 pancarcinomas (i.e., HNSC vs THCA) by applying the Bonferroni correction test for multiple comparisons.
The LS mean difference between treatments was highly significant, at −1288.94 pg/ml (95% CI: −1575.34 to −1002.54), P < 0.001 ( Fig. 2E ).
Overall, epigenetic age exceeded chronological age by a highly significant margin (paired t(29) = 9.77, p < 0.001, 95% CI 15.28–23.36).
The quantitative experiment results showed a highly significant correlation between the input and output DNA concentrations (t = 10.84, p < 0.001) with a mean slope value of 1.05, indicating the accuracy of our qPCR assay to estimate DNA abundance of T. pityocampa in bat faeces.
This analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between the expression of TFR1 and miR-148a ( r = −0.435, P = 0.001) (Fig.
We found that heterozygous parents produced a highly significant excess of heterozygous genotypes for markers within the MUP cluster (χ 2 = 71.2, df = 2, p < 0.001), whereas for markers flanking the cluster, offspring genotypic frequencies did not differ from Mendelian expectations (χ 2 = 3.52, df = 2, p = 0.17, Supplemental Fig.
A highly significant (***p ≤ 0.001) decrease of DOCK8 expression to 63% (±28.5% standard deviation (SD)) in ERU compared to healthy controls (100% ± 38.3% SD) was detected by western blot (Fig. 3A,B ).
The final model was considered highly significant ( − 2 L L = 193.832 , χ 2 (1) = 64,347, p < 0.001), although the effect size was slightly small ( R C S 2 = 0.168 ; R N 2 = 0.195 ; R M F 2 = 0.093 ).
The goodness of fit to the model (χ 2 ) resulted highly significant in all cases ( P < 0.001; Table 1 B).
The differences between groups proved highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 3 ), with mean C-values over five times higher in hemimetabolans than in holometabolans (Fig. 3 ).