Fisher’s exact test was applied to assess an association between GCV and MBV resistance and it was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001). 4.
Excerpts
The depths avowed more highly significant (p < 0.001) SOC stocks in topsoils (0–30 cm depth) than that of the subsoils (30–60 cm depth) in the two cropping systems.
After 240 days of the paint application, overall mortality (all surfaces) of nymphs in both treatment groups (76–96% for the P formulation, 100% for the OP formulation) showed highly significant differences with the mortality of the control group (2.07% ± 1.72) (p < 0.001).
The results will be considered highly significant when the significant probability is less than 0.001 (***p-value <0.001).
The intergroup comparison showed a highly significant difference (Z = −4.189, P < 0.001) (Table 5 ).
After excluding the four-flash stimulus, a linear regression analysis showed that the number of flashes reported was a highly significant predictor of the number of flashes actually presented ( R 2 = 0.86, F (1,52) = 367.4, p <0.001), with a nearly unitary slope ( β = 0.93, t (52) = 19.2, p <0.001), indicating that as the number of flashes presented increased by one, the number flashes reported was also likely to increase by one.
Differences in ISR total score and sub-scores between admission and discharge/follow-up were statistically highly significant (paired t -test) with p -values < 0.001 (***), with a minor exception for “eating disorder” where differences between admission and follow-up had a p -value of < 0.5 (*).
From Figure 8 , it can be concluded that in April 2022, the number of female cones had a significant negative correlation with the K content in November 2021 ( p < 0.05, r = −0.46), a very significant negative correlation with the N content in July 2022 ( p < 0.01, r = −0.51), a significant negative correlation with the K content in July 2022 ( p < 0.05, r = −0.40), a significant positive correlation with the C:N ratio in July 2022 ( p < 0.05, r = 0.38), and an extremely significant negative correlation with the K content in November 2022 ( p < 0.001, r = −0.62).
The analysis revealed one highly significant discriminant function (eigenvalue: 14.318; % of variance: 100%; canonical correlation: 0.967; Wilks’ Lambda: 0.065; X 2 : 53.216; p < 0.001).
Warping in side-to-side was highly significant ( P = 0.001) while DNL was not significant.
The results indicated a highly significant difference in moisture content among the three Abies species ( p < 0.001).
The significance thresholds were set at p < 0.05 (*) for significant correlations, p < 0.01 (**) for highly significant correlations, and p < 0.001 (***) for very highly significant correlations. 2.6.
For the hypothesis that the dose reduction was larger than 33.3% compared to a full heart scan, we employed the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; the tests indicated that the reduction was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
AP demonstrated a highly significant positive correlation with shanzhiside methyl ester ( p < 0.001) and a significant negative correlation with barlerin ( p < 0.01).
A highly significant ( p < 0.001) season effect was observed in the contents of ash, protein and added water, whereas a significant effect ( p < 0.05) was found in the contents of lactose and solids-non-fat.
A positive and moderately significant relationship was found between rumination and suicide probability (r = 0.441; p = 0.001).
The t- t est result revealed a highly significant difference in the overall motivation level between the experimental class and the control class (t = 4.477, P < 0.001), and t he effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.070) was relatively large, indicating a substantial effect.
Substance abuse was highly significant on metaregression (β = −1.35, standard error [SE] = 0.26, t = −5.24, p <0.001).
Water Absorption Test and the Effect of Treatments The analysis of variance showed a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) effect of the applied treatments on seed weight after water absorption.
The difference between CRC patients and normal controls was statistically highly significant ( P<0.001 ).
Differences in survival between the etiological groups were highly significant (P<0.001), with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of 89.8, 78.1 and 67.2% respectively in PAH opposed to 86.6, 65.4, and 53.7% respectively, in PH-LD.
Although no significant difference of CCD counts between the acupuncture and control groups was found ( P = 0.325), a highly significant positive effect of acupuncture was detected in center B ( P < 0.001).
The villus height/crypt depth ratio also differed significantly among the groups: the ZL group presented a significant difference compared with the ZC group ( p <0.01), whereas the ZLZ group presented an extremely significant difference from the ZLZS group ( p <0.001).
In total, 38.1% of novel SNPs were found in these regions compared with 21.4% of all SNPs, and this difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001, chi-square test).
The allele (A12DHd or GDDH33) present at this locus has a highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on the ABA content of that line (Figs 5 a, S5b).