3A to D , the candidate recovered viruses, namely, rAdv-ChGM-CSF, rAdv-HN, and rAdv-ChGM-CSF-HN, had highly significant ( P < 0.001) mRNA gene expression differences in the HEK-293A-infected cells compared to the wtAdv-infected cells and nonchallenged [NC] noninfected cells.
Excerpts
As for a* values, all fillets showed a decreasing trend with storage time, from positive values (slightly reddish tones) to negative values (greenish color), regardless of the treatment ( p ≤ 0.001).
Results: Highly significant ( P < 0.001) improvements in KAP scores, PI scores, GI scores and caries activity were reported at 3 weeks and 6 months follow-up examination.
Serum analysis of SIRs revealed highly significant inverse correlations in the entire evaluated AD population between patients’ age and serum levels of sCD25 ( r s = –0.78, p < 0.001) and sCD30 ( r s = –0.63, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 , Figure 2 ).
Clinically, a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) was found between the presence of the vacA gene and emetic syndrome.
The model can make predictions of the WNP TC density averaged over the WNP (0°–60°N,100°E–180°) during June–August, which corresponds to the first half of the WNP TC season 34 , with a highly significant skill ( r = 0.67, p < 0.001) for the first summer (Fig. 5a ) and a moderate skill ( r = 0.39, p = 0.017) for the second summer (Fig. 5b ).
Results There was a highly significant moderate agreement κ = 0.461 ** ( p < 0.001; Bonferroni-corrected p -value [ p B ] = 0.006) (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.281–0.642) between the RULA scores assessed by both technologies.
Moreover, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in overall survival between high and low ACSL5 expression groups (p = 0.013), while PRDX1 showed even stronger prognostic value, with an inverse survival trend and highly significant difference (p < 0.001) ( Figures 7J, K ).
There was a highly significant difference between the 3 groups ( p < 0.001).
The log-rank tests for equality of survival functions were highly significant, p < 0.001 both for inpatient and specialized outpatient care indicating no differences between categories of duration of a SA spell.
The linear mixed model yielded a highly significant coefficient of 5.7 for difference in modality ( P < 0.001), supporting the mean difference from the Bland-Altman plot.
The rates of hypospadias during the two observation periods (25 among 2780, 2 among 1911) are highly significant different (p<0.001).
The data were analysed statistically using SPSS version 21 and found out that the immunohistochemistry was found to be extremely significant (p<001) by Chi-Square test.
Risk and management intensity Regression analysis in Figure 3 indicates the highly significant linear relation between risk and management intensity indexes (R2 = 0.433, P<0.001).
lucens and the other forage species was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Intriguingly, we observed a highly significant inverse association of ITGB4 and the level of tumor-associated CD45 + leukocytes ( p < 0.001, Fig. 10 B).
Susceptibility to Baculovirus anticarsia Throughout, comparisons between control and infection treatments were highly significant (χ 2 = 37.51, df = 1, P <0.001), with uninfected and infected larvae surviving for mean times of 261±2 (mean±SE) and 221±4 hours, respectively.
Considering both the SNPs and the mutational group, the association with GC that was extremely significant when considering total PUL scores ( p < 0.001, p = 0.01), became non-significant when considering only the partial scores of the shoulder.
The measured Net PIPR indicating different responsiveness to the wavelengths was 0.13 mm for PD subjects and 0.61 mm for control subjects, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
3,4,5-TMBS, however, displayed no significant difference in COX-2 inhibition relative to ibuprofen at 1 μM but demonstrated a highly significant increase in inhibition ( p < 0.001) at 50 μM.
The main effect of the dose was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
This 9.4 year difference in life span is highly significant ( t -test, P ≤0.001).
In the second regression model predicting career-related decision-making self-efficacy from proactive personality, generative artificial intelligence acceptance, innovation competency, and the interaction term between generative artificial intelligence acceptance and innovation competency, the overall model was highly significant, accounting for 58.5% of the variance in career-related decision-making self-efficacy ( R 2 = 0.585, F = 174.985, p < 0.001).
Further, not knowing where to get tested, which was a significant barrier across the entire participant group, was highly significant among women ( p ≤ 0.001, N = 91) but not in men (P = 0.314; N = 28).
The BT term was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) when incorporated into the models for all species except American plaice and golden redfish.