Results of Chi-square test suggested that the frequency of RVA positive samples by either of the diagnostic assay combinations were different at a highly significant level (p< 0.001).
Excerpts
Further evidence for consistent ranking of the apps’ performance across the different subclasses was the highly significant Kendall’s coefficient of concordance ( W = 0.88, P < 0.001).
We found a highly significant and moderate positive relationship between the two ( r = .46, 95% CI [0.34, 0.56], t (207) = 7.36, p < .001; Fig. 3b ).
There were also highly significant differences between age groups, in terms of age at first using injectable steroids, t (818) = −16.17, p < .001, and for age at first using oral steroids, t (699) = −16.04, p < .001.
Again, significant differences within the cohort were observed, with highly significant correlations between the C1 signature and PLAU/invasion module (p<0.001), the C2 signature and STAT1/immune response module (p<0.001), and the C4 signature and VEGF/angiogenesis module (p = 0.001).
Highly significant Pearson's coefficients between observed and predicted values for LF (0.69 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.61 to 0.79], p<0.001) and malaria (0.61 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.71], p<0.001) also indicate the validity of these models.
Consequently, the difference in mean RFC values between high- and low-FE chickens is highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The results were considered significant when p (degree of significance) is less than 0.05, very significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.001.
It is interesting that there was a significant trend for total patients with VNSSTIs to develop anemia (10.2 ± 0.3 g/dL, p < 0.001), hyponatremia (132.3 ± 0.8 meq/L, p < 0.001) and hypoalbuminemia (2.09 ± 0.07 g/dL, p < 0.001) during hospitalization.
Carrying out the same analysis on recognition data revealed even more pronounced results: Participants in the free-viewing condition recognized on average 14.6 billboards ( sd = 3.25; recognition_rate free-viewing = 0.73) compared to only 7.1 billboards recognized in the trash-counting condition ( sd = 3.68; recognition_rate trash-counting = 0.35), which is a highly significant difference ( t 38 = 6.78, p < 0.001, d = 2.14, see Fig 2 , right panel).
The bias towards the shortest chromosomes is highly significant, P = 0.001.
Results Postnatal immune development in EPT infants The PLS‐DA model of anti‐CD3/CD28‐induced cytokine and chemokine levels was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in separating EPT at different time points, even if some overlapping could be seen between groups (Figure 1b ).
There was a highly significant difference between A9- and A10-like dopamine neuron populations in the grafts [within-subject factor – Staining, F (1,60) = 111.48, p < 0.001] influenced by both the host environment [Transplantation Site, F (3,60) = 14.19, p < 0.001] and the VM age [Donor Age, F (1,60) = 31.59, p < 0.001; Transplantation Site × Donor Age, F (3,60) = 4.48, p < 0.01].
The random effect of site identity was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 3 ), emphasizing the influence of unmeasured local factors and supporting the inclusion of random effects to account for ecological variability across sites.
Autochthonous Malaria trends in Spain throughout the 20th Century After applying the Mann-Kendall-Test for the trends of the annual number of cases for the malaria mortality in Spain (1900–1959) we have found a significant trend ( n = 59, p < 0.001, slope ( Q ) = −50.8).
A KMO score of 0.968 and a highly significant ( χ 2 = 426,042.12, degrees of freedom [ df ] = 903, p < .001) Bartlett's test of sphericity confirmed the adequacy of the data for factor analysis, that is, the correlations in the correlation matrix are unequal to 0. 3.1.1.
A Spearman rho correlation coefficient of rankings between the TS-TD and BFRB groups was highly significant ( r s = 0.68, df = 22, P < 0.001).
Within the groups, the improvement seen in mean Qmax was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Force values obtained on the glass sample were up to 30 times higher compared to those obtained on wax surfaces ( Figure 3a , inset) and showed highly significant differences with the latter (Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA on ranks: H 4,159 = 121.922, P < 0.001; Table 3 ).
The overall model was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and demonstrated a substantial explanatory power, accounting for 38.7% of the total variance in 6‐month weight loss ( R 2 = 0.387).
Their pooled heat map indicated that they preferred to stay in the CS+ arm (Figure 5H ) and the quantitative analysis of the time spent in each arm of the maze revealed a highly significant preference for the CS+ arm (Figure 5I ; U = 148, p < 0.001).
Extremely significant differences are observed ( P < 0.001) between mung bean seedlings continuously exposed to audible sound with swept frequency band of 2.0–2.5 kHz and the controls.
A highly significant linear correlation was observed between the daily maximum and daily minimum temperatures (y=0.98x+10.26, R 2 =0.957, p<0.001, online supplemental figure 2 ).
MRT 0-∞ and t 1/2 of WEP-GU decreased and had a very significant difference ( P < 0.01) compared with Control, AUC 0-∞ decreased and had a extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with Control.
(Table 2 ) shows all four multivariate statistics (Pillai’s, Wilks’, Hotelling’s, Roy’s) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that the set of dependent variables differed as a function of group condition.