The estimate of σ G 2 was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all traits.
Excerpts
The difference between males and females in attitudes towards use of distance education was also highly significant (p < 0.001): 38.7% of males versus 19.9% of females indicated a positive attitude ( Figure 2e ).
In episodic migraine, MMSE ( p = 0.017) and CDT ( p = 0.048) showed smaller but statistically significant declines, whereas all other cognitive tests demonstrated highly significant worsening ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) is shown between the latter two groups.
This revealed a highly significant covariation of freezing with synaptically expressed GluA1 (sGluA1, r 2 = 0.9648, P < 0.001) but not extrasynaptically expressed GluA1, although we still detected a strong trend (eGluA1, r 2 = 0.6217, P = 0.0624).
Gaze position We found a highly significant difference between the four groups ( F 3 = 33.12, p < 0.001).
Choice A 2 (Choice) × 2 (Music) ANOVA of the choice manipulation check revealed a highly significant Choice main effect, F (1, 111) = 46.49, p < .001, η 2 = .295.
For melan-b/B16-F10RR hybrids there was no significant difference in the total numbers of clones obtained but there were fewer small and more large colonies after growth with TPA, the difference being highly significant by the chi- squared test (P<.001).
The obtained p-values were highly significant for the comparison of the group with amalgam fillings and the group without fillings (p<0.001), that is, for the comparison of the group with amalgam fillings and the group with composite fillings (p<0.001).
to midnight is highly significant (p <.001) compared to the female's.
The results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.001.
The association between IAB and s-Ptf was highly significant ( P = 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).
There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) interactive effect of age with grand-maternal diet on telomere length at 6 months of age, strongly suggesting accelerated ageing of the ovarian tissue in the recuperated group.
5 Discussion 5.1 The effect of acceleration on cognitive load From the results of the main effects test, the increase in cognitive load by accelerated playback of instructional videos reached a highly significant level (g = 0.59, p < 0.001), and the hypothesis H1 was valid, i.e., accelerated playback significantly increased the cognitive load of learners compared to original speed playback.
Linear mixed-effects model analysis demonstrated a highly significant overall main effect of time for CD4+ recovery (p<0.001).
Conversely, the direct effect of counselling-based accommodations on psychological safety was positive and highly significant ( β = 0.27, SE = 0.05, Z = 5.40, p < 0.001), with a confidence interval of [0.17, 0.38].
In this sense, differences were considered as non-significant (NS) when p > 0.05, significant (*) when p < 0.05, very significant (**) when p < 0.01, and highly significant (***) when p < 0.001.
3.2.2 Grain yield The factorial ANOVA revealed that nitrogen availability was the dominant factor influencing quinoa grain yield, with a highly significant main effect (P < 0.001; Supplementary Table 2 ).
A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed.
Results: At the third time period (40–60 min), there were no significant differences in clot sizes with the original protocol ( P = 0.09), but a highly significant difference was noticed with the modified protocol in both the centrifuges ( P = 0.001).
Human Cytokine Array Human cytokine array assessment showed intensity of anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β1, and IL-4 were highly significant among the analyzed groups (F = 64.456, p = 0.001) and (F = 20.426, p = 0.007), respectively ( Figure 7 and Figure 8 ).
Student’s t -test was used and p -value < 0.05 (*) was considered significantly different from control, p < 0.01 (**) moderately significant and p < 0.001 (***) highly significant.
The clusters at the T8, Fz and Cz sites showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001), ( p = 0.003), and ( p = 0.001), respectively, at around 250 ms and the T7 site showed a less significant cluster ( p = 0.008) at around 250 ms for the between-group comparison.
Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 421.35, df = 28, p < 0.001), confirming the suitability of the data for structural exploration.
For the entire set of 389 articles, the correlation between the logarithm of the number of edits and the imbalance of an article is r (387) = -.51 and statistically highly significant, p < .001.