The Tukey HSD multiple comparison test shows a highly significant difference between the number of edible mushrooms consumed by Ngando and other ethnic groups ( p value < 0.001).
Excerpts
2.49 ± 0.88 versus 3.12 ± 1.01; TC/HDL-C: 3.94 ± 1.07 versus 4.81 ± 1.46), glucose (83.08 ± 21.49 versus 88.64 ± 25.12), blood pressure (SBP: 126.47 ± 18.87 versus 133.74 ± 17.97; DBP: 80.67 ± 10.37 versus 84.14 ± 10.55), and BMI (26.61 ± 85.88 versus 27.09 ± 44.67) as compared to males, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Table 2 ).
The isolation-by-distance analysis also supported a genetic gradient by showing a highly significant correlation between geographic and log-transformed genetic distances (number of permutations = 9999, r = 0.296, p < 0.001). 3.5.
In the AREDS category 3 and 4 participants, the odds ratio (OR) was highly significant for neovascular AMD (OR, 0.62; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.43–0.90; P = 0.001) but not significant for either central GA (OR, 0.75; 99% CI, 0.45–1.24; P = 0.13) or any GA (OR, 1.08; 99% CI, 0.70–1.65).
6.7% in controls), a highly significant difference (χ2 = 17.923, p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).
Again the hemisphere (contralateral vs ipsilateral) × classifier (integrated vs independent) interaction was highly significant ( F (1,30) = 13.394, p=0.001), and did not interact with group (p=0.088).
Post-error RT Main effect of Time (Pre, Post) on normative post-error RT slowing was highly significant ( F (1,50) =15,14, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.134, observed power = 0.795 at alpha (α) = 0.05).
Likewise, we observed a decreasing trend in both sexes (male and female, APC = −7.6% and −5.1%, respectively; p -value < 0.001).
Approachiness (a measure of directionality of hive approach) was the only parameter that showed a highly significant reduction from 0.30 and 0.42, for C GE and C S bees respectively, to 0.11 in the Nc-group ( F TR 2, 86.3 = 9.98, p <0.001) ( Tables 1 and S1 ).
With the covariates excluded from the model, a one-way between-subjects ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect for group ( F (3,110) = 6.4, P < 0.001; ηp 2 = 14.9).
RESULTS NA/STZ‐induced diabetic rats showed a very highly significant elevation ( p < .001) in fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels after oral glucose loading (3 glucose/kg b.w.) as compared to normal rats (Table 1 ).
Among sociodemographic factors delayed reporting was highly significant with older age group ( P = 0.001), low socioeconomic status ( P = 0.02), rural residence ( P = 0.026) and with insufficient knowledge of Head and Neck cancer ( P = 0.014).
Weekly differences were highly significant ( F = 3.22, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.51), indicating that age accounted for a substantial portion of variance.
The overall ANOVA is highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The study was highly significant for the primary outcome ( P < 0.001) with OR of 15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.32–56.31] for HR-MRI predicting AH.
There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation between the study areas and respondents' educational level.
All the correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001) and demonstrative of very good reliability.
The R 2 value for females is 0.939 and for males is 0.940; both of these values are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The difference between the three groups in terms of convexity reduction was highly significant (ANOVA P <0.001).
Spearman analysis indicated a highly significant positive correlation between the abundance of Prevotella melaninogenica and M pneumoniae ( P < .001).
The ST by G interaction had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on the GY and all SRIs, except for two out of 10 water SRIs in the second year ( Table 1 ).
Although low, the genetic differentiation among populations was highly significant ( p -value < 0.001).
If we treat each fixation as independent of the others, the K-S test produces highly significant effects for both the training stimuli ( D (2025, 1913) = 0.114, p < .001) and the transfer stimuli ( D (2049, 1825) = 0.083, p < .001).
The 2 × 2 × 2 (group by salience by conflict status) ANOVA indicated highly significant main effects of group ( F 1, 160 = 32.25, p < 0.001) and conflict status ( F 1, 160 = 32.25, p < 0.001), with a significant interaction of group by conflict status ( F 1, 160 = 7.17, p < 0.01).
In contrast, nationality demonstrated a highly significant association with biologic allocation (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001), as did recoded ethnicity (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001).