Excerpts

Karshan et al 16 reported it is an anxiety disorder. The results of the present study showed highly significant differences in anxiety scores between the case and control groups (5.9±1.5 vs. 4.6±2.2, p<0.001).

The differences in AUCs between the models were highly significant (P < 0.001), even after controlling for multiple comparisons.

Mean and standard deviation values are listed in Table 1 . Statistical analysis for comparison among the two groups concerning mean values of primary stability showed a significant difference between them, p value = 0.014 and upon comparing the mean values of secondary stability between the two groups, a highly significant difference was found, p value < 0.001.

We find a highly significant ( p <0.001) or significant ( p <0.05) fit to the decay models for Platichthys flesus and Gasterosteus aculeatus , respectively.

The higher tendency of the bolder fish to leave cover alone led to the bolder fish initiating the majority of joint trips, with highly significant asymmetries in the number of initiations for pairs with large temperamental differences (paired t -tests for SL: t 10 = 6.35, P <0.001; BL: t 9 = 3.82, P = 0.004; figure 2 ) and marginal asymmetries for pairs with moderate temperamental differences (paired t-tests for SM: t 13 = 2.17, P = 0.050; BM: t 24 = 1.98, P = 0.059; figure 2 ).

Additionally, the ANOVA showed that the main effect of tone presence was highly significant ( F (1,24) = 20.48, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.46).

At peak exercise in HFpEF, predictors of indexed lactate levels included female sex and CKD, with age approaching significance [female: 0.03 mmol/W (95% CI 0.01, 0.04), P < 0.001; CKD: 0.03 mmol/W (95% CI 0.01, 0.05), P < 0.001; Table 5 ].

With regard to completion time, we observed a highly significant (p <0.001) statistical difference between the time needed to complete the SFES scale (about 7 mins) and the time needed to complete the question on cohabitation status (about 10 s) ( Table S3 ).

Supra-threshold assessment The repeated measures MANOVA on subjective ratings revealed that the concentration of SO 2 has a highly significant effect on all of the ratings (p < .001) with higher ratings at high concentrations.

Results: There was a highly significant difference between PAC and NPH regarding P4HB and SOX4 expressions in favor of PAC (both P <0.001).

BMI showed a positive trend with increasing OSA severity ( P < 0.001).

The relative mRNA expression levels of the Vg gene showed markedly significant differences between the treatment groups and the control groups collected on the days 9 ( F = 156.06 6; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001), 18 ( F = 131.693; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001), 26 ( F = 257.967; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001) and 32 ( F = 376.706; df = 3, 11; P < 0.001).The Vg mRNA expression levels in insects treated with 60 μg/mL Vg protein were 27-, 51-, 6-, and 2.5-fold higher than those of control groups on days 9, 18, 26, and 32, respectively.

This was evident by a highly significant reduction (p<0.001) in mean fluorescence detected during 6 h period ( Figure 3A ).

Furthermore, the resistance performance of the same accession remained relatively stable across environments, as evidenced by highly significant positive correlations in the infection index among the three environments ( P < 0.001).

A sensitivity analysis confirmed that after excluding these two patients, the efficacy in the remaining nine patients remained highly significant (61.24% proteinuria reduction, p < 0.001; 26.61% eGFR increase, p = 0.008).

However, a highly significant difference (P< 0.001) was found between RelyX TM Unicem and G-CEM TM cements.

The difference between these two groups was statistically highly significant ( P =0.001).

Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Received Non-Targeted First-Line Therapy For second-line TTD, there was a significant trend ( p < 0.001) among the four cohorts ( Figure 3 A).

However, there was a significant trend in which the gap in AUROC values between the stacking ML model and MEWS increased gradually ( P < 0.001).

With fixed effects of the year and hospitals in column (2) and column (3) of Table 4 , length of stay had a slightly significant decrease if cluster standard errors by hospital were not included (0.73 days, p < 0.001); however, the decrease of length of stay was no longer significant after cluster standard errors by hospital were included ( p > 0.05).

The coefficients of the sinusoidal terms were highly significant in all cohorts (F-test, all p -values <0.001), indicating that the model with seasonality better accounted for the data than did a model with just an exponential increase with age.

The difference was still highly significant when HIC carrying the protective allele B*57 or B*27 were excluded from the analysis (1.54 [0.78–3.23], n = 15 B*27 neg B*57 neg HIC, p<0.001).

The difference in the average CFU values between the TA2-nHP66 group and other two groups was highly significant at all time points (p < 0.001), while there was no statistically difference between the nHP66 group and the debridement only group up to 8 weeks after the debridement surgery ( Fig. 5a ).

Although friend’s support did not reach statistical significance, teenage pregnancies reported more internet’s friends (37.6% vs 24% p < 0.001) and significantly lower satisfaction with school (16.6% vs 6%, p < 0.0001).

Correlation Analysis The Spearman correlation analysis showed significant relations among several of the studied parameters; in particular, a highly significant correlation was found ( p < 0.001) between HADS-a and BDI (rho = 0.866), HADS-a and HADS-d (rho = 0.810), HADS-d and BDI (rho = 0.804), PSQI and BDI-II (rho = 0.772), PSQI and HADS-d (rho = 0.736), PSQI and HADS-a (rho = 0.723), PSQI and MIDAS (rho = 0.540), MMDs and MIDAS (rho = 0.507), PSQI and MMDs (rho = 0.443), MMDs and MADs (rho = 0.422), and MIDAS and HIT-6 (rho = 0.416); the remaining significant correlations may be found in the Supplementary Material (see Supplementary Figure S1) .