Intraocular Pressure Dynamics Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of time on IOP [F(1.8, 70.2) = 312.5, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.89].
Excerpts
ANOVA showed a highly significant year effect on yield ( p < 0.001), whereas MG and Year × MG were not significant.
In contrast, anti-HAV IgM titers exhibited a decreasing trend with age ( p < 0.001; Figure 7 D). 4.
Anterior/posterior and hemisphere main effects were highly significant ( F = 57.27; p < 0.001 and F = 17.03; p < 0.001, respectively), condition main effect was not significant ( F = 3.05; p = 0.094).
The median SWE values were significantly greater in BI-RADS 4B lesions (45 kPa; IQR: 39–50) than in BI-RADS 4A lesions (38 kPa; IQR: 29.5–39.5), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test).
All F STs were highly significant ( P > 0.001).
The effect of the year was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with total dry matter yield in 2024 being approximately 76% lower than in 2023.
One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of vibration class, with F(4, 3974) = 22,486.6, p < 0.001.
On the corner test, the four-group analysis revealed a significant Group main effect (F(3,151) = 3.48, p = 0.034) with a highly significant Day effect (F(5,151) = 88.74, p < 0.001); the cumulative-burden AUC analysis confirmed this group difference (F(3,23) = 3.17, p = 0.046), and Tukey HSD post hoc indicated that rMSC-ION animals had significantly lower cumulative sensorimotor deficit than the published ischemic Control animals ( p = 0.040), whereas 293T-ION animals did not differ significantly from Control ( p = 0.254).
The Davey’s and Vancouver scores showed highly significant predictive performance in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions ( p -value < 0.001).
The machine learning–based correlation matrix consolidated the findings of the non-imputed matrix in general; most importantly, it also produced a very highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlation between age and EI.
On the contrary, when comparing location, according to PERMANOVA, there are highly significant differences between the Almotivo and DISAFA vineyards ( p = 0.001; Figure 4 B).
A ∗ p value of ≤0.05 was deemed statistically significant, ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01 was regarded as moderately significant, and ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001 was considered highly statistically significant.
Firstly, the average BMD in the pelvic fracture group was 0.763 ± 0.026 g/cm2, which was significantly lower than 0.925 ± 0.051 g/cm2 in the normal group, with a statistically extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001), suggesting that low BMD is a main risk factor for pelvic fractures.
This difference was statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
The ANCOVA demonstrated a highly significant main group effect on post-test absolute error, F (1, 29) = 19.336, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.400 (a very large effect size).
A medium effect size (−0.70) but highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in WBSF of −1.04 kg was detected.
Notably, the collagen deposition in the composite hydrogel group reached 45.19%, representing a highly significant difference compared to the blank group ( p < 0.001).
When acting on Avicel ® , mutants E185V/Q108M and E185V/Q108M/A249P exhibited reducing sugar yield of 0.78 g/L and 1.36 g/L, respectively, representing highly significant increases ( p < 0.001) of 27.8% and 122.9% compared to An LPMO15g (0.61 g/L).
There were extremely significant differences among various age groups in term of aggression and NSSI ( P <0.001).
In addition, there was a highly significant relationship between doing the breastfeeding during work time and the duration of EBF for six months ( P < .001).
Correlation of all three histological grades with the Glucksberg stage of intestinal GvHD was highly significant in terms of the maximum, median, mean, and even minimum of all three grading system scores (each p ≤ 0.001) ( S1 – S3 Figs).
All the spectrophotometric assays thus performed showed a highly significant positive correlation (R 2 ≥ 0.9454, p ≤ 0.001) with each other ( Table S3 ).
The response “no other treatments available” was highly significant ( P = .001), and this meant patients with gastrointestinal cancers were more likely to answer that they were interested in phase 1 trials because there were no alternatives.
ANOVA highlighted Flour Type as a highly significant factor ( p < 0.001), which suggests that PCA2 captures variability strongly associated with flour composition rather than fat structure ( Figure 2 ). 3.1.2.