In addition, the quadratic term was highly significant, F (1, 13) = 69.4, p<.001.
Excerpts
To assess community structure differences between SERT −/− and SERT +/+ mice, co-occurrence networks were generated for highly significant ( p < 0.001, SPARCC ) bacterial species-species co-occurrences (Fig. 4A,B ).
Spearman correlation analysis between the mean DISCERN and GQS scores revealed a highly significant positive correlation between the two measures (ρ = 0.75, p < 0.001).
A highly significant association existed between current academic level and perception ( p < 0.001).
beta: 0.01 (95% CI: -0.15; 0.18); P = 0.88), whereas the indirect path was highly significant (std. beta: 0.19 (95% CI: 0.08; 0.31); P < 0.001).
Regression analyses: predictive values of the entire models, modifiable, and fixed predictors All R 2 were highly significant ( p < 0.001) without exception.
( 2 ) based on the GBD2019 dataset showed that the variation trend of incidence for birth defects between 1990 and 2019 globally was not statistically significant, but showed an increasing trend in China ( p < 0.001), with an annually percentage changes of 0.26%, and the upward trend was projected to continue between 2020 and 2030.
The difference between the 2 groups for anti-HAV IgM positivity was highly significant ( P < .001).
Summary statistics of threshold values over gradient of vergence stress confirmed a highly significant decrease with increasing vergence stress (p < 0.001 in all experimental modes) ( Table 2 ).
There was a highly significant difference between the quotient of the TBI and CVF group ( p < 0.001).
Both the time dependent changes and the direct vs synaptic responses amplitude were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001) when analysed by two-way Anova.
Correlation between PgR and ER levels was highly significant ( P <0.001) but moderate (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, r =+0.50) and is illustrated in Figure 1 .
Regardless of the adjustment for the confounding factor, the risk of death in AT1-AA–positive patients was significantly higher than that in AT1-AA–negative patients and exhibited an increasing trend (unadjusted OR, 3.79 [95% CI, 1.75-8.22; P = .001]; adjusted OR, 4.63 [95% CI, 1.41-14.58; P = .01]) ( Table 3 ).
Inhibition difference was observed to be highly significant between results of IFN-7 plus IL-4 and IFN-T alone (p < 0.001) and LPS plus IL-4 and LPS only (p < 0.01).
Although the total AE prevalence did not increase with age ( P = 0.35), a highly significant difference in the total CE prevalence was evident between younger and older students ( P < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
The correlation between the levels of VASP-PRI and VerifyNow-PRU was highly significant (r = 0.682, p < 0.001) (Figure 2 ).
There was a significant trend towards reduced treatment delays during the pilot compared to the pre-pilot period (z = 8.6, p < 0.001).
Six of the seven cases also showed a significant trend towards an increasing proportion of cells with greater than 2 signals per nucleus occurring with histological progression ( P < 0.001).
This difference is statistically highly significant (P < 0.001, see Table 2).
Statistical highly significant was at P value < 0.001.
Although there was no significant difference in the animals’ body weight between SML-treated or SML-ANPs-treated animals during the first two weeks, the difference after the third week was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).
Nonreacting (FFMQ) The full-null model comparison was only marginally significant after correction for multiple testing ( χ 2 = 116.82, df = 13, p < 0.001, p cor < 0.001, R 2 marg = 0.050, R 2 cond = 0.622; see Fig. 3 for scores and Fig. 6 for a visual summary).
Phase was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating strong differences between cell cycle phases and this is consistently explaining variability in percentages, while neither the Ganoderma species, cell line, nor their interactions significantly affected the percentages in any of the models ( P > 0.05).
All these differences are highly significant ( P <0.001).
A highly significant effect of age was found in the within-litter analysis [F(1.84, 14.75) = 1132.01, p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.99], as well as a significant age by neonatal condition interaction [F(1.84, 14.75) = 17.16, p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.68].