Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP < 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
R ESULTS Analysis of flexural strength values for all the study groups by two-way ANOVA indicated a very highly significant difference between the means of all main groups ( F = 14056.27, P < 2.2E-16) and between the means of subgroups ( F = 94.41, P < 2.2E-16) [ Table 1 ].
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Based on the comparison of intact to degraded cartilage, the log-fold-changes in RNA expression and the differences in mean promoter region methylation values demonstrated a small but highly significant correlation (Pearson’s r = −0.08, p < 2.2 × 10 −16 , Fig. 2b , Supplementary Table S7 ).
highly significantP < 2.2E−160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Importantly, the global shift observed with RRP41 knockdown was statistically highly significant ( P < 2.2E−16, Jonckheere trend test) and was not observed with the U2-type introns located immediately up- or downstream of the U12-type introns (Figure 3F ) or in the group of all the U2-type introns in the same genes.
highly significantp<2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed a very weak but highly significant correlation in synonymous heterozygosity between species (Pearson’s r = 0.14, p<2.2e-16), consistent with some degree of conservation for genic parameters of mutation rates and/or selection at Drosophila synonymous sites [ 58 , 70 – 74 ].
highly significantp < 2.2×10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation between predicted and measured scores was highly significant ( Figure 3C , Pearson’s r = 0.35, p < 2.2×10 −16 ) and reduced substantially when a randomized version of the ontology was used ( r = 0.04); the maximum achievable correlation, as previously determined by experimental genetic interaction replicates ( Baryshnikova et al., 2010 ), was r = 0.67.