Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,635 sentences

highly significantp -value < 2.2 × 10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All fitted models were highly significant ( F 5,122 = 26.1, p -value < 2.2 × 10 -16 with ‖ Δ ^ ̄ − Δ ‖ as response; F 5,122 = 47.7, p -value < 2.2 × 10 -16 with λ ^ ̄ as response; and F 5,122 = 12.1, p -value = 1.6 × 10 -9 with | ε ^ g e n − ε ̃ g e n | ̄ as response); residual plots showed no large deviations from the assumptions of normality of error distribution (an asymptotic normal distribution of the response variables is warranted by the central limit theorem), homoscedasticity, and independent errors (data not shown).
highly significantP <2.2e -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, we saw a slight but highly significant correlation (Pearson R 2 = 0.308452; P <2.2e -16 ) between a transcript sequence’s similarity to rRNA and the magnitude of the difference in coverage between the no selection and rRNA-depleted libraries (Additional file 11 : Figure S9 and Additional file 12 ).
IVT-seq reveals extreme bias in RNA sequencing.
Genome Biol · 2014 · PMC4197826
highly significantp = 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, the relationship between the two methods of load estimation was highly significant (F 1,72 = 2420, p = 2.2 × 10 −16 ), and the slope was not significantly different from 1 (0.96, 95% CI [0.97, 1.05]), supporting the hypothesis that only Wolbachia w Sc1 and w Sc2 circulate in the S. cleopatrae flea populations.
highly significantp < 2.2×10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Supporting this hypothesis, a comparison of the mean coverage of the nuwt regions to that of the non-nuwt regions showed a small but highly significant difference between them (Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, p < 2.2×10 -16 for all 13 samples).
highly significantp < 2.2e-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, a linear model comparing the paired connectivity estimates from the 24-particle and 1-particle-per-day scenarios revealed a highly significant (p < 2.2e-16) and remarkably strong linear relationship, closely approaching a 1:1 correspondence (R-squared = 0.999; Fig. 3 ).