When covariates (age, education, sex) were included in the model, BCFT remained a highly significant predictor for all diagnostic groups ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The compleasome response was limited to CSF, with a highly significant difference between infected rats and controls ( n = 11, p < 0.001).
Differences among the three groups were highly significant for age ( p < 0.001) and moderate for distress intensity ( p = 0.003).
As summarized in Table 5 , the proposed method shows highly significant improvements on FECGSYN across all metrics ( P < .001).
Family history of developmental disability was substantially more prevalent among children in Group 1 (85.6%, n = 590) than in Group 0 (45.0%, n = 1,938), representing a highly significant difference (χ 2 test, p < 0.001).
Likert Scale Questions For the question “To what extent do you think Reiki has a sound research base?” ( Table 2 ) the One-Way ANOVA showed that the Levene statistic, the Welch, and the Brown-Forsythe statistic were all highly significant ( P < 0.001), so the assumption of equality of variances was not met.
The log-rank tests for equality of survival functions were highly significant, p < 0.001 both for inpatient and specialized outpatient care indicating no differences between categories of duration of a SA spell.
As expected, the difference in FA levels between formalin-employers and non-employers proved to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
CRP levels decreased significantly in both groups, though the magnitude of reduction was substantially greater in the atorvastatin group ( p < 0.001), resulting in a highly significant between-group difference at 6 months ( p < 0.001).
The basal-like (TNBC) subtype demonstrates a highly significant survival reduction with high glycolytic scores ( p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 2A−D).
A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant (*), P-value < 0.01 highly significant (**), P-value < 0.001 extremely significant (***), and "ns" will indicate not significant.
Many authors define the cutoff value of the normal ONSD as (5 mm) which supports our cutoff point gained from the control group to compare it with the corresponding values of the patients.[ 9 13 ] The current study found a highly significant statistical correlation between ONSD with direct measurement of ICP ( R = 0.933 and P < 0.001), this result goes with the latest studies done in Rome, Italy, that was performed in 2017 by Toscano et al. whose found a strong correlation between ONSD and ICP ( R = 0.895 and P < 0.001).[ 14 ] Another
Students trained by healthcare instructors were particularly more likely to request an AED (OR = 4.087; 95% CI 1.412–13.304; p = 0.009) and correctly turn on the device (highly significant association; p = 0.001).
Concerning organic acids, the lactic acid content showed a highly significant positive correlation with Enterococcus when exposed for 3 d after 3 d of fermentation ( p < 0.001), and it showed an incredibly significant positive correlation with Lactobacillus for 1 d of exposure after 30 d of fermentation ( p < 0.01).
In contrast, Candida auris demonstrated a highly significant difference (p < 0.001), being more prevalent in ICU (n = 56; 3.41%) compared to IPD (n = 14; 0.85%).
The analysis of the void area revealed highly significant differences between the sealer groups and across root sections (p < 0.001).
Given that (1) preparation processes are conceptually linked to criterion adjustment during the CTI, whereas drift rate effects are linked to post-target decision processes and (2) criterion mixing cost was strongly correlated with mixing cost on both RT and drift rate ( r = 0.744, p < 0.001, r = −0.587, p < 0.001, respectively) with effects remaining highly significant when controlling for age ( p < 0.001), we reasoned that criterion-related variability may mediate the relationship between mixing cost positivity and mixing costs in RT and in drift rate.
In the echocardiographic parameters, a significant trend was observed: the left atrial anteroposterior diameter increased from the low-risk group (40 mm) to the high-risk group (45 mm) ( P < 0.001), and LVEF decreased across risk categories, with a median of 45% in the low-risk group, 40% in the medium-risk group, and 35% in the high-risk group ( P < 0.001).
The SNR-50 values show a highly significant difference ( p value ≤0.001), with the 150–200 group exhibiting the worst performance.
Among female participants, tablets were the most frequently used device (50.4%), and there was a highly significant association between tablet use and female sex (p≤0.001).
The effect of THI was highly significant (p<0.001) on pregnancy rate of Murrah buffaloes calved for first time and overall pregnancy rate.
Improved semantic accuracy: All models showed a highly significant improvement in verb semantic accuracy (Semantic Accuracy-V) and comprehensive semantic accuracy (Semantic Accuracy-C) ( p < 0.001).
A simple effects analysis suggests that the participants who were induced self-uncertainty were more likely to judge a pictograph as unpleasant when the pictograph was preceded by isolation prime words (words representing Isolation) ( M = 3.69, SD = 0.61) than when it was preceded by affiliation prime words ( M = 3.99, SD = 0.74), and this difference was highly significant ( F (1, 48) = 16.24, p < 0.001, ŋ 2 = 0.253).
The regression model revealed that preoperative BCVA was a highly significant predictor of postoperative BCVA (0.377 [0.270; 0.485], p < 0.001) indicating that higher preoperative BCVA values were strongly associated with higher postoperative BCVA values.
The differences among the groups were highly significant ( P < 0.001).