In addition to the significance value ( p < 0.05, * significant; p < 0.01; ** highly significant; p < 0.001, *** highly significant), the effect sizes for all ANOVAs were indicated using the partial eta 2 .
Excerpts
The results from ANOVA showed that the effect of genotype factor on pigment contents was highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy measure was 0.80 and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( P<0 . 001 ).
Finally, a third ( Table 8 ) and highly significant model (F(5, 296) = 1604.38, p < 0.001) investigated the relationships between the five subscales of the HPLP II and its total score, explaining 96.4% of the variance.
Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin analysis yielded a high index of 0.941 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (136) = 8,313, P < 0.001), indicating suitability for factor analysis.
P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 were considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 were considered extremely significant.
These differences were highly significant (2 × 2 contingency χ 2 = 663.2; 1 df; P < 0.001).
( 2008 ) on lake Neusiedler See, a large Austrian alkaline lake, reports a highly significant correlation ( ρ = 0.65; p < 0.001) between the detection rate of V. cholerae and temperature, as well as with zooplankton biomass and conductivity.
For 47 identified species, we found a highly significant positive Spearman correlation between the Google score and YouTube hits (r s = 0.739, p < 0.001), and a significant positive Spearman correlation between Google score and number of YouTube videos (r s = 0.344, p = 0.018).
Effects on LDH, CK-MB cardiac enzymes, PAG1 protein and CTLA4 Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant increase in the mean of serum LDH and CK-MB level in I/R group as compared with naive at (p < 0.001) as listed in ( Table 1 ).
As shown in Figure 2 , the prospective effect of SNA on NSSI was strongest and highly significant in the low resilience group (T1-T2: β = .25, p <.001; T2-T3: β = .23, p <.001).
The results showed that the observed zHR increases for subjectively defined togetherness (SRhigh) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), regardless of the Ncell threshold.
However the difference between the lowest (0–240 μg/kg/d) and the highest doses (330–1300 μg/kg/d), including the control, was highly significant (F (1,49) = 9.13; p < 0.001).
The results showed no significant main effect of the CO 2 treatment (F(1, 538) = .49, p = .484), but a highly significant main effect of the three different growth periods (F(2, 538) = 364.89, p <.001) and a highly significant interaction effect between CO 2 and the growing period (F(2, 538) = 29.32, p <.001).
In contrast, the omitted dimethyl disulfide and dimethyl trisulfide models showed highly significant results ( p ≤ 0.001 and ≤ 0.01, respectively).
Phase synchronization The PLV of the theta frequency band between the ACC and right BA40 showed a highly significant Group effect, F (1, 27) = 14.85, p < 0.001.
Statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test produced a Z-value of −12.24, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that this increase in pain severity from summer to winter is not due to random chance.
All differences between these groups are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Results and Discussion Body weight, food intake, and water consumption In Table 1 , FA treatment resulted in a highly significant decrease in final body weight, food intake, and water intake when compared with the control group (p < 0.001).
PERMANOVA analyses showed highly significant differences in metabolite profiles between Fe treatments (Pseudo- F = 14.197, p = 0.001) and collection times (Pseudo- F = 2.494, p = 0.003).
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.
However, the length density of MG processes was a highly significant 30% greater (two-tailed paired t -test, p < 0.001) in immunofluorescent than in DAB-reacted immunocytochemical treated parallel sections ( Table 1 and Figure 3 ).
All four inflammatory indices (NLR, PLR, SII, MLR) exhibited highly significant group differences, even after adjusting for age: Group F-statistics varied from 7.91 to 10.34 ( p < 0.001 for all indices).
While all of the correlations are highly significant (almost all, p<.001), given the varying sample sizes, specific probability-value information is presented separately for each country.
The differences in antimicrobial activity between the groups were highly significant ( p <0.001) as presented in the Table 3 .