The correlation between GO and STOP in each case was highly significant (2-day, p<0.001, r 2 =0.62; 4-day, p<0.001, r 2 =0.57) with a negative slope (−0.40 and −0.46, respectively), indicating that the STOP pattern was, in general, opposite to the GO pattern and that the overall fold-difference magnitude was lower in STOP than in GO.
Excerpts
However, lesion color showed a highly significant association (p = 0.001), with mixed-colored lesions predominating in dysplasia cases, whereas white lesions were more frequent in non-dysplastic cases.
Occupation: Also tested via ANOVA, occupation emerged as another highly significant factor ( p < 0.001).
Differences in Physical Activity Levels The one-way ANOVA revealed that there were highly significant differences in the levels of PA (as measured by total METs-min) of youth across the three cities (F 2,2244 = 258.02, p < 0.001).
Remarkably, the difference in nuclear MTA1 overexpression between patients with localized PCa was highly significant (p < 0.001), with Caucasian Americans having higher levels of MTA1.
Inventory measurement was the strongest and only highly significant predictor of profitability (β = 0.383; p < 0.001), followed by inventory control, with a smaller but significant contribution (β = 0.257; p = 0.013).
To examine the children in the proximity of cutoff thresholds, we also used the 80th percentile cutoff point (ie, abnormal or border range), which showed that 36 (97%) children were above the cutoff point at baseline, while the respective figure at the 24-month follow-up was 23 (62%), indicating a highly significant change ( P <.001, McNemar test).
Of note, although the difference in glycemia between the 2 test groups was a highly significant one (P<0.001), this did not translate into significantly higher levels of AGEs, AOPP (AOPPs, AOPPldl or AOPPhdl) or lipoprotein peroxidation (oxLDL and oxHDL) ( Table II ).
There were highly significant differences between the shape of the frequency–intensity relationships for all groups at 20 μA versus 50 or 80 μA (p<0.001, Friedman’s test) even after controlling for changes in the median intensity caused by increasing current amplitude.
Starting from day 5, zeolite demonstrated a highly significant stimulatory effect on the germination percentage ( p < 0.001).
In this study, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and marked with *; p < 0.01 was considered statistically highly significant and marked with **; p < 0.001 was considered statistically extremely significant and marked with ***. 3.
Furthermore, all interaction effects (A × D, A × T, D × T, and A × D × T) were highly significant ( p = 0.001), indicating that larval mortality depended on the specific combination of isolate, concentration, and exposure time.
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed for genotype (G), environment (E) and genotype × environment interactions (G × E).
Permutation-based ANOVA (999 permutations) for the bacterial community confirmed that the overall RDA model was highly significant (F = 157.9, p = 0.001).
Results There was a significant trend ( P < 0.001) toward increased vascular risk with decreasing levels of education.
The ANOVA indicated that the main effect of Conflict Adaptation was highly significant, F (1,52) = 11.70; p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.20.
Among the agronomic traits, the plant height, stem diameter, and leaf number exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with fresh herbage yield ( p < 0.001), with the correlation coefficients exceeding 0.8.
A three factor ANOVA testing for the effects of zeitgeber period, day length and genotype on the phase of E activity (done for T22 to T28) revealed highly significant effects of all factors on the timing of E activity, zeitgeber period: F (3,663) = 496.96; p < .001; day length: F (2,663) = 2943.38; p < .001; genotype: F (1,663) = 2716.92; p < .001.
The established regression model was found to be statistically highly significant at a 95% confidence interval (Fmodel = 11.38, p = 0.001).
Spatial autocorrelation in PBBA II block occupancy data was highly significant (Z‐test, p ‐value < .001) for all six study species (Global Moran's I, mean = 0.33; Table 1 ).
The elicited antibody response of mice as illustrated in Figure 4 showed a highly significant ( p value < 0.001) increase in O.D reading of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated group in comparison with control group and peptides groups at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 10 post-vaccination.
Plant height before treatment and plant height after treatment under control conditions had highly significant correlations with NDVI values ( r = 0.70, P < 0.001 and r = 0.76, P < 0.001, respectively) ( Table 4 ).
The quadratic models ( Table S4 ), containing only significant terms (p < 0.05), were highly significant (p < 0.001) and accurate (p-values of lack-of-fit > 0.05) for all variable responses.
The statistical results were expressed as follows: non-significant for p > 0.05, statistically significant (*) for p < 0.05, very significant (**) for p < 0.01, and extremely significant for p < 0.001 (***) and for p < 0.0001 (****). 3.
Additionally, the ATS revealed a highly significant main effect of time, F (3.00, ∞) = 7.77, p < 0.001.