These differences in behavior were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for all items; Pearson's χ 2 values: food bodies χ 2 = 17.3, df = 1; egg χ 2 = 141.3, df = 2; insect parts χ 2 = 180.9, df = 2, ham χ 2 = 191.9, df = 2; straw χ 2 = 183.7, df = 1).
Excerpts
Total post-test scores were highly significant (P < 0.001) than pre-test scores.
suis , 7 (17.9%) patients were exposed to pig, and this association was highly significant ( P <0.001).
The correlations between sessions for the control group were highly significant for μ ( r = 0.81, p < 0.001; N = 17), σ ( r = 0.58, p < 0.01; N = 17), and σ Ε ( r = 0.66, p < 0.01; N = 17) indicating good replication of saccade parameters between sessions, within subjects.
With respect to cluster * age, Tukey’s HSD post hoc tests revealed that there were highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences between two of the clusters (1 * 3 and 2 * 3).
By week 4, MBP expression had further increased in the taVNS group, showing a highly significant difference compared to the control group (Figs. 4 H-I, J; p < 0.001).
The mean and standard deviation of the responses for each of the belief-based statements as well as the Cronbach’s alpha or Pearson correlation coefficient where appropriate for each measure can be seen in Table 3 . Principal component analysis with varimax rotation To measure sampling adequacy of the responses to misinformation and rumor shared on social media we used Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy, which was very high (0.928), and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, which was highly significant (χ 2 (66) = 10,284.73, p < .001).
Inclusion of this trial in a meta-analysis rendered the overall results highly significant ( P < 0.001) and suggests that low-dose aspirin reduces vascular events by 26% and should routinely be considered for PAD patients, including those with type 2 diabetes [ 18 ] .
Most POMs showed highly significant differences between groups across the entire cohort ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
Across all four experimental conditions, analysis of variance (ANOVA) consistently demonstrated significant effects of genotype on disease response, with F-values ranging from 26.65 to 122.02 and highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001), as shown in Table 3 .
On the basis of the number of participants in the two groups who moved from offender to non-offender status during the follow-up period, the highly significant effect of treatment ( P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) is 0.32 to 0.49 (Cramer, a medium to large effect).
The decrease in viability was highly significant (p<0.001 by unifactorial ANOVA for all cell lines), Post-hoc testing reveals that the difference between solvent control and salinomycin treatment is significant for all concentrations >1 μM for all tested cell lines after 72 hrs; the difference is significant for 1 μM only in MDA-MB-453.
However, when the data were analyzed along the lines of gender a highly significant difference was observed between the genotype distribution of the male POAG and control samples (χ 2 =13.2 [p=0.001]; Table 1 ), while no significant difference was observed in the case of the females (χ 2 =2.93 [p>0.05]; Table 1 ).
A statistically significant result was defined as P < 0.05, and a highly significant result as P < 0.001.
All of these variables had highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001), indicating meaningful differences between clusters.
We found no significant differences between the intervention group and the control group for IC6 and ProC3, nor for the ratio between IC6 and C6M, whereas for C6M, a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) was observed ( Figure 1 ).
All the BOD POD regression coefficients for FFM were the same as for the FM coefficients, but in a positive trend (p<0.001 for all associations).
A highly significant correlation was, however, found between ROMs and CP oxidase activity levels in both goat kid and lamb sera ( p < 0.001).
An extremely significant correlation ( R = 0.74, P < .001) was found in BMI and serum leptin level in the case group.
1 ): the strain with the mutation for the methionine regulator MetR showed a highly significant, severe defect (CI = 0.028 ± 0.021; P < 0.001), while the strain with the mutation for a regulator of unknown function encoded by the locus VC1947 exhibited a less significant defect (CI = 0.719 ± 0.632; P < 0.05).
In addition, six variables from the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs domain remained highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 5 ) in the multivariate logistic model, indicating their independent contributions to Pap test behavior. 4.
Highly significant Pearson's coefficients between observed and predicted values for LF (0.69 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.61 to 0.79], p<0.001) and malaria (0.61 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.71], p<0.001) also indicate the validity of these models.
Also, there was an apparent trend towards increased LVMI with increasing transaortic mean PG (regression coefficient 0.986, 95% CI 0.682–1.291, p<0.001).
In addition, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed across multiple feature representations, including raw conductance, temperature, proportional adjustment, and adaptive scaling, consistently yielding highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ).
VEGF A & TGF β1 measured in arbitrary units (AU): Both growth factors showed highly significant scores in the CTG immersed in i-PRF analyzed in the CTG + i-PRF group, compared to the CTG alone from the CTG group ( P -value < 0.001), with large effect sizes for both growth factors suggesting a substantial magnitude of difference in growth factors expression between groups ( Table 5 ).