Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Epimedium brevicornu showed highly significant differences in the stomatal area compared to E. davidii (mean difference = 261.01, p < 0.001), E. fangii (mean difference = 252.50, p < 0.001), and E. franchetii (mean difference = 218.51, p < 0.001), but exhibited minor differences with E. sagittatum and E. stellulatum ( p ≥ 0.05).
a positive trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Neonatal central adiposity (determined using waist:length ratio) was negatively associated with maternal age, and positively associated with the following parameters: smoking status, maternal pre-pregnancy arm circumference, percentage energy from saturated fat in late pregnancy, postprandial glucose at 28 weeks gestation and membership of the control group with a positive trend towards association with trimester 2 glycaemic load R 2 adj 38.1% (F = 8.000, p < 0.001).
NgR1 , Lingo1 and Troy significantly decreased at 28 dpi compared to control animals, while p75 mRNA levels did not reach statistical significance, supporting the duality of this receptor complex ( Figure 4 A, p < 0.001 vs. control; Figure 4 B,D, p < 0.05 vs. control).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of molecular variance indicated highly significant genomic variation ( F ST = 0.1925, p < 0.001, df _groups = 5, df _error = 148, 1000 permutations) among these populations (Table S1 ), but IBD analysis (Mantel Test) returned a non‐significant result ( p = 0.264, y = 0.22 + 2.1e−07 x , r 2 = 0.0131; Figure S5 ).