A highly significant positive correlation was found between the total HNE scores and the anterior midbody FA measures (rho = 0.929; P = 0.001) and similarly between the motor-specific scores and the anterior midbody FA measures (rho = 0.857; P = 0.007).
Excerpts
A quantitative analysis of lipid oxidation, using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARSs), revealed that the OC and OCEL groups exhibited markedly lower values than both the control (CON) and the linseed-only (EL) groups, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
For those who initiated PrEP due to having multiple sexual partners, a Chi-square test was conducted, revealing a highly significant association ( p < 0.001).
The AMOVA revealed that 38.8 % of the genetic variation was due to differences between populations, and the resulting F ST value was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Interestingly, PC1 was associated with higher levels of inflammatory factors ( Figure 8A ) and a highly significant LPS effect ( p < 0.001) in the three brain areas, as well as a pretreatment by treatment interaction ( p < 0.05) in the STR.
HR resulted in highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among all the measurements except between the fifth (post RLE 240°/s) and seventh (post LLE 180°/s) measurements.
Analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects for litter (p<0.001), phenanthrene (p<0.001), and soil (p<0.001).
The effect of this treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.001, n = 9 per group) as indicated by two-way ANOVA.
The root pH of herbaceous plants showed a significant negative correlation with K soil , water content and CEC content ( p < .01), whereas it exhibited an increasing trend with soil pH ( p < .001; Figure 3a–d ).
The Bayesian LMM analysis found that the main effects of condition ( F = 12.2, p < 0.001) and frequency ( F = 173, p < 0.001) were statistically significant; the interaction between Condition and frequency was also highly significant ( F = 114, p < 0.001), showing that log-PSD was higher during the poststimulus phase only at the 4-Hz frequency, and that at 8 Hz the order was flipped with higher log-PSD observed during the Baseline period.
We found a significant trend (χ 2 for trend: P<0.001) between the duration of therapy and the success of treatment, even if the clinical gain was modest.
When compared to healthy controls, PCOS women's serum adiponectin levels was shown to be considerably significantly lower (p=0.001**).
Statistical analyses were done using one way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in R program (alpha value 0.05) with P value <0.001 considered as highly significant. ‘***’ denotes P<0.001.
The interaction among the three variables was highly significant ( p = 0.001), indicating that depending on the concentration and time frame observed, the medicaments present varying cell viability.
In addition, we found a highly significant decrease in BV/TV in the primary spongiosa of Lmna G609G/G609G bones compared to Lmna +/+ at both ages (-23%, p=0.001 and -38%, p=0.002, respectively) confirming the optical assessment of a thinner hypertrophic zone in few animals ( Supplementary Fig 4 ).
The type of school had highly significant ( P < 0.001) influence on the impact of permanent anterior teeth fracture on OHRQoL with negative OHRQoL among the corporation schools.
This difference was statistically highly significant (t = 6.984, P < .001), as shown in Figure 3 .
The highly significant positive correlations ( P < 0.001) to DOM, BP-S, HL-S, and LM-S might indicate that this understudied clade also encodes capabilities of organic carbon usage, as in the aforementioned NP clades.
YPP expressed positive highly significant correlation with HSW (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), while it showed negligible negative correlation with DF and PM.
*P<0.05 represented significant changes, **P<0.01 represented highly significant changes and ***P<0.001 represented very highly significant changes.
One-way analysis of variance was performed with Dunn’s Test following ranked-based ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks) and the Student–Newman–Keuls method taking p < 0.05 as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant and p < 0.001 as extremely significant and represented by an asterisk in the figures.
This showed a highly significant difference [χ 2 (3)=74.67, p <0.001] between the performance across the four lists (2 mono-syllabic and 2 bi-syllabic list at 0 and +10 dB SNR) each participant heard.
Differences in the distribution of functional assay scores across all three variant groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
There was a highly significant association between nationality and self-esteem (χ 2 = 13.507, p < 0.001).
From the statistical point of view, there were highly significant statistic differences (p<0.001) between the groups, the one with LVH and the other without LVH, regarding variables like the LES and the wall thickness.