All correlations were very highly significant (all P < 0.001).
Excerpts
Differences in STs during 2002–2016 and during 2018–2019 were highly significant (p<0.001).
The overall composite mean target difference between P1 and P2 was highly significant p < 0.001 EGDT substantially reduced time to antibiotics (1hr 55 mins in P1 vs 1hr 13 mins in P2 p < 0.001), IV fluids and blood were more frequently given to shocked patients; airway placement in coma was more likely.
The difference between the means of mean sedation score, emergence behaviour score, mean emergence time was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).
3.3 Correlation analysis Spearman rank correlation revealed highly significant associations between self-reported bench press maximum weight and initial performance during CB-tDCS (r s = 0.842, p < 0.001, z = 1.228) and SH-tDCS (r s = 0.827, p < 0.001, z = 1.179).
The Pearson’s correlations between the kappa scores and number of genes harbored in the enriched modules were − 0.947, − 0.983, and − 0.914 for Control_MIH, Control_Fresh, and Control_SPH respectively, and were highly significant (P < 0.001).
The degrees of significance were as follows after the post hoc screening: not significant ( p > 0.05), significant ( p ≤ 0.05), very significant ( p ≤ 0.01), and extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.001).
The Bartlett test of sphericity for foods and nutrients among males and females was highly significant (p<0.001), indicating homogeneity of variance by the consumption of foods and nutrients.
For IS, assessing male and female combined, a decreasing trend of -3.84% was determined (CI: 95% [-4.52: -3.16]; p < 0.001).
Effects of Extraction Variables on Antioxidant Activity Following the analysis of ABTS results utilizing RSM, the model showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) regression represented by the following equation: ABTS = 330.8855 + 58.5485 * X 1 − 84.9180 * X 1 2 + 99.5563 * X 2 + 3.3621 * X 2 2 + 22.9206 * X 3 − 12.0931 * X 3 2 + 27.1134 * X 12 − 12.7727 * X 13 + 32.5420 * X 23 (R 2 = 0.93) Overall, the statistical results, as represented by the ANOVA test, the R-squared value (R 2 ), the positive coefficient of regression (β = 330.8855), the low p -value (<0.001), and the high t-value (12.62), confirm a positive relationship between the predictive and experimental variables.
There was a strong and highly significant correlation between baseline Spike+RBD+ memory B cell frequency and D614G-specific antibodies in previously infected individuals (R = 0.84; P < 0.001), confirming the expected relationship between these two parameters.
There was a highly significant main effect of Picture Category ( F (2, 30) = 99.0, p < .001, η p 2 = .868) which was also accompanied by non‐significant effects for Time ( F (1, 15) = 3.38, p = .086, η p 2 = .184) and Time by Picture Category ( F (2, 30) = 0.34, p = .712, η p 2 = .022).
For the remaining traits, the correlation was lower at r = 0.40 *** to 0.50 *** but still highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The average number of nominations was similar across the generations and by geographical area, but increased with higher socioeconomic status (2.9 for the highest, 2.3 for the lowest) and was greatest for women aged 45–54 years (3.0) and less at younger and older ages than this (e.g., 2.2 for ages 16–24; 1.9 for age 65 and older) (these differences are highly significant, P <0.001).
This increase in primary implant utilization from ~40% to ~70% of cases is highly significant (χ 2 , p < 0.001).
Highly significant differences were found between the global SALSEX score at baseline and after switching to vortioxetine (t = 12.279, p < 0.001).
This inverse correlation was highly significant (χ 2 = 36; P <0.001).
In agreement with this, we found a highly significant correlation between courtship display across years (2006 and 2007) (r = 0.76, p<0.001) for the 15 sires used here.
Statistical results were statistically significant with p < 0.05 * (significant), p < 0.01 ** (highly significant), and p < 0.001 *** (very highly significant). 3.
The highly significant ( p < 0.001) permeation was achieved from EM-NLCs-opt and EM-NLCs-opt-IG4 than EM-IG.
The PLV of 1ST spikes remains within the 95 percentile of the surrogate distribution for most of the fixation period but shows a highly significant increase ( P < 0.001) at around 60 ms after fixation-onset ( Fig. 8 C , D ).
Furthermore, highly significant changes were observed in the scores of images compared to those of videos and text messages ( P < 0.001) at T2.
Firstly, the presence of the BCA in co-culture compared with the control had a highly significant effect on gene activation ( p < 0.001).
In summary, the impact of fatigue level on QoL, physical health, and mental health, adjusting for other factors, was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and had a medium-to-very-large effect size.
3 E ) on a subset of the cohort (n = 62 patients) and found a highly significant correlation in staining scores (Rho = 0.822, p < 0.001).