Excerpts

Intragroup comparison of the density of GMP at baseline and 3 months' PO for Group I and Group II showed highly significant results ( P < 0.001) only [ Table 3 ].

p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) highly significant and p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant.

The differences were strong (Wald’s χ 2 ≥ 11.80) and highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the volume, depth, and particularly for width of the soil–root plate.

However, the influence of floral stage remained highly significant for all of these variables ( P < 0.001).

At an initial 1 μM concentration, the pure CR showed 94.6% cell viability, whereas the CR-MC depicted highly significant ( p < 0.001) cell viability (60.86%).

All comparisons between uncoated and coated samples across LDH Day 2, LDH Day 7, ALP Day 7, and Mineralization were highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating substantial differences between the two groups.

Test drug produced highly significant ( P < 0.001) reversal in the triglycerides and very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol along with nonsignificant decrease in the cholesterol level in rats fed with hyperlipidemic diet.

We found a highly significant constant term, representing a main effect of the condition contrast ( Wilks λ = 0.293, F (4,38) = 22.914, p <.001, ηp 2 = 0.71) in general as well as for each of the four subjective ratings (subjective burden: F (1,41) = 75.531, p <.001, ηp 2 = 0.65; self-compassion: F (1,41) = 11.211, p <.01, ηp 2 = 0.22 ; equanimity: F (1,41) = 59.198, p <.001, ηp 2 = 0.59; effort: F (1,41) = 45.203, p <.001, ηp 2 = 0.51), representing higher subjective burden and effort as well as lower equanimity and self-compassion during training compared to control trials.

There was a clear trend (Table 2 ) that height was greater with increasing degree of myopia, and the difference in height between all groups was highly statistically significant ( p < 0.001).

Results: The bond strength of group 4 was statistically highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) compared to the other groups.

In contrast, in the post-implementation phase, 80 patients had 277 episodes over 1,496 person-days (18.5 events per 100 person-days), representing a highly significant decrease (χ 2 (1)=145.26, p <0.001) following PUSH implementation.

Significant figures Suggestive significance: 0.05 < p value < 0.10; Significant: p value < 0.05; Highly significant: p value < 0.001.

Both models revealed a highly significant overall and nonlinear association between platelet levels and outcomes (overall P < 0.001; nonlinear P < 0.001). 4.

There was a moderately significant positive correlation between the mean CFS total score and the mean GSS total score ( r = 0.549; p < 0.001) (Table 3 ).

We also observed a significant trend of increased absolute divergence with distance between populations of H. erato – H. e. chestertonii (Mantel's test: R 2 = .44; p = .001), H. melpomene – H. cydno (Mantel's test: R 2 = .69; p = .001) and H. melpomene – H. timareta (Mantel's test: R 2 = .56; p = .001).

There was a highly significant relationship between torsional ME ( R p /Ar.ct) and periosteal circumference ( p < 0.001, group R 2 values = 0.71–0.89, Fig. 1 ).

This test was highly significant, p < 0.001, and indicated that the two correlations between Weber fractions of the two visual cue control conditions within each presentation format were significantly different from one and other: Weber fractions between the two visual cue controls in the sequential conditions were correlated, while Weber fractions between the two visual cue controls in the simultaneous conditions were not related.

In the figure, the notations “NS,” and “*” represent no significant difference ( p > 0.05), significant difference ( p < 0.01), and highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

When four additives with RNA and four without RNA content are combined together into two groups, differences between means of percentage of sa WT phenotype is highly significant (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, P <0.001).

Statistical analysis using the chi-square test demonstrated a highly significant association between the clinical indication and the biopsy’s effect on management ( p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis of these two groups is highly significant (p < 0.001, Students t -test).

In group II, there was a highly significant negative correlation between hs-CRP and serum 25(OH)D at baseline (r = −0.832 and p = 0.001) and after two weeks (r = −0.590 and p = 0.021) [ 51 ].

The results were considered significant when p value <0.05 and were considered highly significant when p value <0.001.

ANC visits demonstrated a highly significant relationship ( p < .001), as did maternal tetanus vaccination ( p < .001).

Genotype As expected, genotype had a highly significant impact on myostatin concentrations (Fig. 1 ): homozygotes had lower mean plasma myostatin concentration than heterozygous horses (p < 0.001), and heterozygous horses had lower mean myostatin concentration than wild type horses (p < 0.001).