Excerpts

Statistical analysis of relative FAK phosphorylation confirmed a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) 2- to 3.5-fold decrease of FAK phosphorylation in AGSΔ cttn cells compared to their parental control ( Figure 5 C).

The model with all six predictors resulted in a significant R 2 value (R 2 = 0.301, p < 0.001), wherein the first model (stroke and global cognition) explained the largest part of WR variance with a highly significant R 2 change (ΔR 2 = 0.254, ΔF = 11.560, p < 0.001).

There was a moderately significant negative correlation between cough frequency and laryngeal hypersensitivity (r= −0.430, p<0.001; figure 3a ), suggesting an association between cough frequency and laryngeal hypersensitivity.

fulvum line gave a highly significant variation, P = 0.001 ( Table 4 ).

There was no significant main effect of lime or pasture type on the P concentration in herbage, however, both lime × year and pasture × year interactions were highly significant ( P < 0.001) due to the strong year effect (Table 2 ).

This difference in likelihood is highly significant assuming a χ 2 distribution ( P < 0.001; Table 1 ).

Overall models were highly significant ( p < .001) and indicated individual responses on included SWA indexes generated overall classification accuracy rates that exceeded chance levels, particularly for the identification of arthritis subgroup membership (see Table 4 ).

Intriguingly, in EBV-positive patients, the difference in DFS between SPC-prognosis groups was highly significant [HR: 2.608 (0.735–9.254) in intermediate-risk, 17.656 (3.839–81.200) in high-risk group, log-rank p <0.001], necessitating further investigation.

However, there were highly significant correlations of L5 activity with RRI (ρ = −0.53, P = 0.001) and LF/HF (ρ = 0.44, P = 0.007) during L5 in the total participants indicating that dominance of the sympathetic system relative to the parasympathetic system is associated with higher activity during sleep.

In consequence of a highly significant main effect of effect of STZ treatment ( F (1,25) = 12.715, p = 0.001) and a significant interaction between STZ and LIR treatment ( F (1,25) = 10.075, p = 0.004), subsequent Bonferroni multiple comparison tests revealed that Glut1 relative expression levels were reduced in the STZ/SAL group compared to the VEH/SAL group with high significance (p = 0.0002) and that after LIR treatment Glut1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in the STZ group (STZ/SAL vs.

The total indirect effect was highly significant (β = .32; p < .001), while there was no significant direct effect from CM to MD symptoms anymore in the total model (β = .002, p = .957).

In experimental group, the findings showed that there was moderate correlation (r=0.48) between post-test telephone etiquettes and post-test professional etiquettes scores which was found to be highly significant (p=0.001) at 0.05 level of significance.

The first one, comparing the performance in Quiet to the mean performance for AM and ST noise, was highly significant, F (1, 52) = 1589, p < 0.001, as was the interaction with Group, F (1, 52) = 11.95, p < 0.005.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the equation was sufficient to predict production under any combination of variable values.

Results Serum RBP4 level had a highly significant association with hyperuricemia ( P <0.001).

The overall model was highly significant ( F 1,12 = 59.3, P < 0.001), with size class ( F 2,71 = 83.0, P < 0.001), time ( F 1,71 = 24.9, P < 0.001) and temperature ( F 1,71 = 133.0, P < 0.001) being individually significant factors.

When compared to the saccharin-exposed animals that received NaCl injections, two factor ANOVA (factors: genotype, treatment) indicated that there was no significant difference in aversion index (AI) on day 1 between WT and GRPR KO mice (F (1,42) = 0.95; p>0.3), no genotype×treatment interaction (F (1,42) = 0.31; p>0.5), but a highly significant difference in AI between the groups that received LiCl versus NaCl injections (F (1,42) = 739.6; p<0.001, Fig. 5A ).

Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of G6PD in Both Protocols Over Time Comparisons between T120, T150, and T180 for both protocols showed extremely high ICC values (ranging from 0.967 to 0.996), all with highly significant p ‐values ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ). 3.3.

The Kruskal-Wallis test was highly significant ( H = 30.80, p < .001, ε 2 = 0.444), showing higher scores in both RT regimens versus no RT ( p < .001) but no difference between regimens ( p > .05).

Repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically highly significant effect of exposure on recognition rating, F (3.42,68.42) = 71.734, P < 0.001 (the sphericity assumption was not met, so Huynh-Feldt correction was applied).

NT-proBNP Reflects Hypertrophy Rather than Dilatation or Dysfunction Highly significant correlations were found for interventricular septal thickness (LVH, r = 0.678; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = 0.243; p = 0.276, Figure 3 A,D), left ventricular maximum wall thickness (LVH, r = 0.717; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = −0.227; p = 0.502, Figure 3 B,E) and left ventricular mass index (LVH, r = 0.549; p < 0.001 vs. no LVH, r = 0.184; p = 0.298, Figure 3 C,F).

Table 4 below presents the detailed reasons for not being on HRT among those non-HRT users. There was a highly significant difference between mean knowledge scores and level of education ( p < 0.001).

The global values for Wald coefficient are high for all the performed regressions and highly significant ( p <.001 in all cases).

The type of place of residence was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with rural [26.3%, 95% CI: 21.5%, 31.8%] and refugee [42.5%, 95% CI: 28.9%, 57.3%] populations showing higher malaria prevalence compared to urban areas [7.0%, 95% CI: 3.7%, 12.9%].

The consumption of foods not recommended for diabetics was highly significant in rural rather than urban subjects p<0.001, in subjects with poor glycaemic control (HbAc1>7%) rather than good p<0.001.