The strength of association ranged from moderate (r = 0.40 to 0.59) to strong (r = 0.60 to 0.79) and has been found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
Although the improvement of self-care behavior is observed in all six dimensions of self-care in the experimental group, the difference was clearly significant in the dimension of interpersonal communication P<0.001) ( Table 2 , 3 ).
With the full dataset ( n = 4,851) year classes and the family effects were tested; year classes did not show significant effects ( p = 0.106), while the family effect was highly significant with p < 0.001.
The accepted level of significance in this work was stated at 0.05 (P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.001 was considered highly significant). 8 Results The present study comprised of 300 cases.
Offspring size responded nonlinearly to temperature, as indicated by a highly significant effect of temperature squared in the linear model ( F 1,547 = 46.84, p < .001).
The seasonal Mann–Kendall trend test showed a significant decreasing trend in malaria cases over the study period (z = − 6.04, p < 0.001) as well as a decreasing trend in mean temperature (z = − 12.06, p < 0.001).
This resulted in a highly significant decrease of the ANG-2:ANG-1 ratio at both time-points (p < 0.001 for month 6, p = 0.002 for month 12, Figure 1 C).
That in the right hemisphere following left half-field stimulation averaged 27 ms, whereas that in the left visual cortex following right half field stimulation was 38 ms, a highly significant difference between the hemifield conditions (F(1,56) = 12.4, p < 0.001).
ANOVA showed that sample type had a highly significant effect on CUPRAC ( p < 0.001), and post hoc comparisons indicated that spray samples differed significantly from the lowest categories ( p < 0.05).
Surprisingly, each genome exhibits a large variation of removal rate among the various families that it harbors (for all the six genomes, the one-way ANOVA test is highly significant with a P value < 0.001).
All domains except Overall Q O L show highly significant differences (p < 0.001). * Sex: Male (N=281) and Female (N=219).
At 3 weeks, the effect of the group was not significant (F 2,69 = 0.50, p = 0.61), whereas the number of littermates had a highly significant effect (F 1,69 = 21.6, p < 0.001).
Trade-offs and synergies between ESs There is a similarity in the trade-offs and synergies between ESs at the county and sub-watershed scales, with most ESs showing a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001).
Regarding oocyte retrieval, breed had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) impact on the number of total COCs, available COCs, and grade A COCs per ewe ( Table 1 and Table S1 ).
Although the P values suggested highly significant results ( P <.001), the relatively small correlation coefficients suggested that SJL did not correlate with age in all subjects ( r =-0.03, P <.001).
Key findings are summarized below (main Effects and Interactions): ➢ Planting Spacing: Highly significant effect (F=197.042, p < 0.001) in the first analysis, with similar significance in subsequent models. ➢ Travel Speed: Also, highly significant (F = 240.250, p < 0.001) in the first analysis, though significance varied across models (e.g., F=3.509 F =3.509, p=0.015 p =0.015 in the third analysis). ➢ Interaction (Spacing × Speed): Significant in the first two analyses (p<0.001 p <0.001) but non-significant in the third (p=0.999 p =0.999), suggesting context-dependent effects. 1.
The correlation of stem diameter in the three seasons was between 0.84 and 0.86, showing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 1 a,b).
Correlation of homopolymer’s length and quality values is -0.195 which is highly significant (p<0.001), Figure 3 illustrates correlation with boxplots where base quality scores decrease with the length of homopolymers.
This improvement continued at 48 hours post-operation, with the right knee achieving a mean SLR of 59.00 ± 11.99 compared to 49.83 ± 13.49 for the left knee, showing a highly significant p-value of <0.001.
A Pearson’s chi-squared test revealed a highly significant association between site and infection status (χ2 = 67.33, df = 3, p < 0.001), indicating strong spatial heterogeneity in parasite transmission risk across the region ( Figure 2 ).
The analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between HRT and BPA removal ( r = 0.993, p -value = 0.001; Table S11 ).
At T 2 , a highly significant drop was observed ( p < 0.001), with a mean value of 10963 Hz.
Both FGT and BPE were also found to have a positive trend in the overall analysis ( P < .001) and among postmenopausal patients ( P = .003).
Significant differences in eGFR were observed after cycles 1 through 3, with highly significant reductions emerging from cycle 4 onward (all p < 0.001).
Grayscale analysis ( Figure 5B ) showed that compared to the NOR group, expression of these genes in CIA rat synovial and joint tissues was markedly increased with highly significant differences (p<0.001 for all).