Excerpts

The estimated mean difference in depression scores between disabled and non-disabled students decreased slightly when adjusting for potentially confounding factors; however, the difference in depression scores between the two groups remained highly significant (Pakistan: EMD = 2.3, p-value<0.001; Afghanistan: EMD = 1.5, p-value = 0.003).

Subsequently, a cross-tabular breakdown was used to search for items which show highly significant differences ( p < .001) regarding the general satisfaction with the GP’s support (see Tables 2 and 3 ).

All the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The random effect of site identity was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Table 3 ), emphasizing the influence of unmeasured local factors and supporting the inclusion of random effects to account for ecological variability across sites.

In this analysis, the year effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001), but showed a weak relation to effects of management strategy ( P > 0.05).

Despite the generally low levels of genetic differentiation, the populations exhibit a highly significant signal of isolation-by-distance (Mantel test r = 0.79, p < 0.001) which becomes especially apparent due to the large geographical extent of our sampling (Fig. 2d ).

4 ) confirm that community changes in response to the outbreak differs between outbreak and reference plots, as indicated by highly significant period × treatment interactions for all three ordination axis (NMDS1, z = 5.54, P < 0.001; NMDS2, z = 6.92, P < 0.001; NMDS3, z = 5.60, P < 0.001).

A moderately significant correlation was observed between cultural competence and the behavioural dimension ( r = 0.448; p < 0.001) and between motivation and the cognitive dimension ( r = 0.310; p < 0.001).

In the final model, the only factors included were CYT19 30585 genotype and age, both of which were highly significant ( p < 0.001; data not shown).

The confounder analysis with covariates “age,” “sex,” and “PET/CT system” essentially replicated these results: the main effect of factor “group” was highly significant ( F (4,158) = 87.0, p < 0.001), with significantly higher iNPHRP scores in definite iNPH than in possible iNPH (adjusted p < 0.005), AD, PD, and HEC (adjusted p < 0.001) and significantly higher iNPHRP scores in possible iNPH than in AD, PD, and HEC (all adjusted p < 0.001).

There was a significant trend of an increasing symptom score and headache frequency, for both age groups with respect to anxiety and depressive symptoms (12–14 years, p < 0.001 and 15–17 years, p < 0.001) and attention difficulties (12–14 years, p < 0.001 and 15–17 years, p = 0.008), but not with conduct difficulties.

This study found a highly significant linear increase in the percentage of MetHb in blood as a function of nitrate dose: MetHb (%) = 41.3 × nitrate (g NO 3 ‐ /kg bw per day) + 1.2 (R 2 = 0.76, p < 0.001).

A decreasing trend was observed for: white race (66% in 2013 vs. 43% in 2017, P < 0.001), uninsured (73 vs. 53%, P < 0.001), condomless sex during oral as well as vaginal/anal sex (22 vs. 10%, P = 0.001 and 16 vs. 8%, P = 0.001, respectively), and self-reported HIV diagnosis (2.5% to 0.9%, P = 0.016).

Thus, R-Wt-4 and R-SSI-4 displayed a highly significant difference regarding mutation types in their mutant spectra (χ 2 = 13.3, P<0.001).

Figure 2 summarizes the abovementioned results, and the prevalence of OaPV1, OaPV2 and OaPV3 was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) compared to OaPV4 prevalence.

As seen in Table 1 , the children in the index group (breath holders) showed low threshold of responsiveness while comparing with the control group and the difference is statistically highly significant with the P value <0.001.

A positive trend was observed between DR prevalence and SUA quartile (χ 2 = 20.76, P < 0.001, crosstabs chi-squared test for trend).

After year 7, all three panel positions showed highly significant SOM enrichment ( p < 0.001), with response magnitudes following the order UP > FL > BP.

An increasing trend was observed for ESBL(+) isolates from IM (AARC = ↑34.54, p < 0.001) and, to a lower extent, from the ICU (↑28.62, p < 0.01).

To quantify the prevalence of nuclear function proteins among D/E repeat proteins, we determined which GO IDs (retrieved from STRING DB) were enriched two-fold or more among these proteins ( Figure 6 , these enrichments were highly significant with Fisher exact p values <0.001, unless marked otherwise).

cholerae O1 and that of the AI-2 overproducing non-O1 non-O139 strains was highly significant (p<0.001).

This indicates that pretest and post-tests within Group A and Group B on asthma patients show a highly significant difference in mean values at P ≤ 0.001 (Table 1 and Table 2 ).

ANOVA revealed that among the 36 cherry tomato genotypes, all 17 traits exhibited highly significant (P = 0.001) and significant (P = 0.01) variations indicating the presence of adequate genetic differences among them.

Time trend analysis revealed that an increasing trend was observed for age at diagnosis ( p = 0.001), proportion of patients without a reproductive history ( p < 0.001), postmenopausal patients ( p = 0.001), invasive pathological cancer type ( p = 0.008), ER-positive rate ( p < 0.001), PR-positive rate ( p = 0.008), and HER2-positive rate ( p < 0.001).

When age was added as a covariate, the associations remained highly significant ( P < 0.001).