Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 9.1 × 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For Subfamily 5 (16 ALMT loci, OG0008930), the test detected highly significant positive selection on terminal Vaccinium branches ( Figure 4 A): 2ΔlnL = 40.65 (df = 1; raw mixture-distribution p = 9.1 × 10 −11 ; Bonferroni-adjusted p = 2.7 × 10 −10 ), with the alternative model recovering a foreground ω 2 ≈ 34.95 in 5.6% of sites.
highly significantp = 9.27 × 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The weight of PbA-C57BL/6 mice started to decrease significantly on day 6 post infection and was the lowest on day 8 both in groups A (− 0.08 ± 0.05% decrease) and B (− 0.08 ± 0.02% decrease), when there was a highly significant difference between the PbA-infected group and the uninfected control group ( p = 9.27 × 10 −11 , Student’s t test) (Fig. 2 a).
highly significantp = 9.51 × 10− 110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The regression model was highly significant (F = 33,119.09, p = 9.51 × 10− 11 ), with slope of 1.0150 (95% CI 1.0007–1.0293) and intercept of 1.0626 (95% CI 1.0327–1.0924), confirming statistical significance of both parameters.
highly significantP =9.8×10 -110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Second, our study had excellent statistical power, yielding highly significant MR associations for IFNAR2 ( P =9.8×10 -11 ), increasing confidence in the validity of the much weaker signals for IFNAR2 reported in the GenOMICC study ( P =0.004), particularly as the earlier report had displayed evidence of confounding by LD ( P HEIDI = 0.015). 37 Indeed, compared to the analysi
highly significantp -value = 1.0 × 10 −100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The darkred gene module had a highly significant correlation between GS and MM with respect to both CVH metrics ( r = 0.39, p -value = 1.0 × 10 −10 ) and BDI-II score ( r = 0.62, p -value = 1.4 × 10 −28 ) ( Figure 3 ). 3.5.
highly significantp < 10 −100.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Despite the small size of the validation set (412 d ( P , T ) and 694 d ( P , P ) interactions), representing only 1% of the possible secondary regulatory interactions, PhosTF predicted 40% of the known d ( P , T ) and 28% of known d ( P , P ) interactions, which was highly significant ( p < 10 −10 ) when compared to the rate of predictions overall (20% and 18% respectively).