Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Using ANOVA with repeated measures, the comparison of the results before and after the intervention revealed highly significant effects of HIIT on body weight ( F = 22.24, p < 0.001), BMI ( F = 13.89, p < 0.001), WHR ( F = 32.92, p < 0.001), and BF% ( F = 14.56, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the 6-item solution, the data collected were suitable for factor analysis, according to Bartlett’s test of sphericity, which was highly significant (chi-square = 233.60, df = 15, p < 0.001), and the value of the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was high (0.763) [ 47 ].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was little evidence of diurnal variability in concentrations of viruses, though there were some highly significant trends ( p < 0.001). pH and turbidity of wastewater In the effluent samples collected at Betws-y-Coed, higher pH values were observed during the summer sampling event (median pH 7.36) than during the autumn and the winter sampling campaigns (median pH 6.79 and 6.62, respectively; Fig. 2 ) with little variation evident during the sampling events (Fig. 3 d–f).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ALP showed a negative correlation with standardized CBF in the right anterior cingulate gyrus ( r s = –0.681, p = 0.003) as well as AST exhibited highly significant negative correlations with standardized CBF in bilateral posterior cingulate gyrus (left: r s = –0.751, p = 0.001, right: r s = –0.800, p < 0.001).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
RESULTS Acetic acid-induced writhing test In acetic acid-induced writhing test, clavulanic acid at doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg significantly ( p <0.05) inhibited acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions and a highly significant decrease was seen at dose of 40 mg/kg ( p <0.001).
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Our findings were substantiated with histopathological scoring for all the lesions where barring perivascular and peribronchial cuffing, for all parameters mice from the group A had significant ( P <0.05) to highly significant ( P <0.001) reduction in lesion scores compared to group B at 1, 3, 5 and 9 dpc ( Fig. 8 , Table 2 ).