By the general criteria of statistical field, the differences are considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05, when P > 0.05, it is considered that there is no statistically significant difference between groups, by “ns”; when P < 0.05, there is a statistically significant difference between groups, indicated by (*); P < 0.01 indicates highly significant intergroup difference, indicated by (**); and P < 0.001 is an extremely significant difference, marked with (***).
Excerpts
With increasing EAT amount, the age and female gender was increasing in a significant trend ( p < 0.001).
In contrast, public healthcare expenditure (PubExp) is positively correlated with all imaging indicators, particularly Gamma cameras (r = 0.466) and PET scanners (r = 0.455), both highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The multivariate test revealed a highly significant effect of driving stage on the combined set of eye-movement metrics: Hotelling–Lawley trace = 2.154, F(15, 5427.21) = 412.83, p < 0.001.
Using the Pearson's correlation coefficient UVB-induced gene expression changes in the human showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.911) between the qPCR array and RNA-seq data, which was highly significant (p<0.001, Fig. 4A ).
The relationship between DBD and CCA was highly significant (AOR = 3.46; 95% CI 2.74–4.36) followed by LM (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI 1.81–2.86) P value < 0.001.
The correlation between the GOSE total score and the QOLIBRI total scale, controlling for the SWLS, remained highly significant (r = 0.35; p<0.001), whereas the correlation between SWLS and GOSE was no longer significant after controlling for the QOLIBRI total score (r = 0.03; p = 0.695).
The origin of the near-significant three-way interaction from the overall analysis was therefore, the dominant data, in which the significant main effect of modality F(2,44) = 10.690), p = 0.001 was modulated by a near-significant interaction with experiment F(2,44) = 8.169), p = 0.07.
Alanine transaminase levels presented a decreasing trend ( p < 0.001), whereas creatinine levels remained unchanged ( p > 0.05), with consistent trends across PH subgroups.
The disparity in mean Fracture Resistance among the four groups was highly significant at P < 0.001.
The high expression of TSP50 in gastric cancers showed a highly significant relationship with junior age at surgery ( P = 0.001), later TNM stage ( P = 0.000), and present lymph node metastases ( P = 0.003). 3.3.
The results (Table S3) demonstrated that the comprehensive score model was highly significant ( P < 0.001, P = 0.004), with a non-significant lack-of-fit term ( P = 0.8265), indicating a satisfactory fit.
Rats subjected to AC treatment alone also showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase in brain TAO levels when compared to SIS rats ( Figure-5 ).
The authors highlighted that the correlation between SI values and EB safety estimates is highly significant (t = 9.64, p-value <0.001), with 77% of the variation in the estimated number of crashes explained by the SI value.
A highly significant negative correlation was observed for the place ( r = −0.6, P < 0.001) condition (Fig. 3 a), indicating that participants that performed better with the left hand had larger volume of the right SLF I (compared with the left SLF I), while those who performed better with the right hand had larger volume of the left SLF I (compared with the right SLF I).
The eigenvalue resulting from this function was 0.757, with an associated λ (Lambda of Wilks) value of 0.569, which was highly significant (p>0.001), indicating that the two sampling areas were statistically different.
Specifically, there were highly significant correlations ( p < 0.001) between DPPH and GABA ( R 2 = 0.77), DPPH and lactic acid ( R 2 = 0.79), DPPH and total flavonoid ( R 2 = 0.76) and DPPH and total acid ( R 2 = 0.81).
The effect of PP242 treatment on tumor growth was highly significant as determined by a Wald test for both the CR 698 trial (p <0.001) and CR 727 trial (p=0.001) but not for the CR 702 trial (p =0.123).
A decreasing trend in visual disability incidence was observed among patients who were more recently diagnosed with exudative AMD (−0.25% point per year; p < 0.001).
In keeping with the speed‐accuracy tradeoff, RT was analogously slower as sensitivity increased (with marginal significance for the latter data set) (3FH: r = 0.506, t 38 = 3.62, p < 10 −3 ; 7CM: r = 0.346, t 19 = 1.61, p = .062).
Similarly, the mean (SD) values for liver function tests of hepatotoxic and non-hepatotoxic patients were compared and found that there exists a highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference between those two groups which is shown in Table 3 .
There was a significant decrease in the mean number of terminal villi (p=0.02), a highly significant increase in syncytial knots (p=0.001), a highly significant increase in fibrinoid necrosis (p=0.003), a highly significant increase in the mean number of stromal fibrosis (p=0.001), and a significant decrease in hyalinization (p=0.05).
Genetic differentiation Analyses based on F ST , F ST‐ENA , and D JOST indices yielded similar results, indicating that the overall level of genetic differentiation among the thirteen populations was highly significant ( F ST = 0.128, p ≤ .001; D JOST = 0.238 p ≤ .001; Table 4 ).
Regarding the magnitude and significance of the changes, all differences were highly significant in statistical terms ( P <.001) because of the large number of users and because of consistent trends among users (the vast majority of users changed their step counts in the same direction, even for small changes).
The results indicated a highly significant improvement in RT during physical exercise periods compared to the baseline test ( P < 0.001).