Both factors and their interactions were highly significant (time window: F = 39.77, p <0.001; PLV measure: F = 50.11, p <0.001; interaction: F = 14.86, p <0.001).
Excerpts
For AI, the main effect of group was also highly significant ( p < 0.001), accompanied by a very large effect size ( η p 2 = 0.54), showing that EG was significantly greater than NG.
This covariance between the pre-exercise values and changes in stiffness is highly significant ( p < 0.001 for MS, MG and AT, cf.
However, three DOX-containing groups exhibited extremely significant differences in the inhibition of tumor growth compared with 5% glucose group ( P < 0.001).
Priority bands showed monotonic separation of event rates, and ANOVA confirmed highly significant between-group differences (F = 147.6; p < .001); Tukey HSD indicated that all pairwise contrasts were significant (p < .001).
Regarding the fixed effects (see Table 1 ), a highly significant Time × Group interaction was observed, F (1, 195.00) = 90.43, p < 0.001, with a substantial effect size ( η p 2 = 0.32).
However, the statistical significance varied from highly significant (P<0.001) to non-significance (P=0.58) despite the same magnitude of effect (a difference of one day).
This pattern is in agreement with the XRF data that show an increasing trend in the ratios of SiO 2 to Al 2 O 3 , from 5.1 ± 1.1 in the lower unit to 7.2 ± 1.3 in the upper unit (Mann-Whitney U test: P = 0.001) (Fig. 4 ).
This association remained highly significant but was less evident when restricting these analyses to only include patients with detectable pretreatment ccfHPV DNA (adjusted HR, 13.4; 95% CI, 4.9–36.9; p < .001) (Table S10 and Figure S4) .
Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.
The overall logistic fit between percentage toxicity (Y) and log concentration of ivalin (X) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all the different exposure times.
The expression level of gene encoding liver MEL1C in GL was higher than the rest of the monochromatic light groups in almost every time period, in which the total expression level of GL was highly significant higher than that of RL (+144.31%, p<0.001, Figs. 4 E and 4 F).
Each assessed HBR risk factor showed a highly significant association (p<0.001), reflecting a strong consensus among the respondents regarding their clinical relevance.
The relationship between home range and body size was highly significant for benthic ( F 1,125 = 151.2, p < 0.001) and pelagic species ( F 1,43 = 61.14, p < 0.001).
A result was considered significant if p < 0.05, highly significant if p < 0.01, and extremely significant if p < 0.001, according to the previous studies. 3.
All observed variables in the studied model were highly significant at p-value < 0.001, and the study variables had strong estimates.
Our results showed a highly significant expression of DMP1 (4.86‐fold; p < 0.001), NRF1 (1.66‐fold; p < 0.02) and RUNX2 (1.5‐fold; p < 0.05) in HSV‐1‐infected hPDLSCs compared to uninfected hPDLCs cultured in osteogenic media (Figure 4B ).
However, a significant difference was apparent in the eLF between the LDF group and the NLF group ( p ≤ 0.001).
For Engagement, the U statistic was 2034.00 with a Z-score of − 3.97 and a highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001), below the critical value (Ucrit = 2580).
In addition, the results of search.conv clarify that when birds inhabit saline environments, the kidney size and SSGs in different lineages tend to be similar (found highly significant under “state,” p = 0.001).
The both rearing systems demonstrated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the mean HDEP performance of Japanese quail fed with CLD compared to the other system.
The significance level for the calculations was set as follows: significant, p ≤ 0.05; very significant, p ≤ 0.01; and highly significant, p ≤ 0.001, using the normal distribution of the variables.
Although there was no significant association between ponesimod systemic exposure (AUC ss ) or PD end points (LC ss or ΔLC ss ) and ARRs, there was a highly significant association between CUALs and ARRs, resulting in a MVOF decrease of 34.838 points (df = 1, p < 0.001).
Among the smokers, the value was even higher in COPD patients (mean value of 10.45 ± 3.03 ppm) in contrast to others (7.05 ± 1.56 ppm) but was highly significant (p-value < 0.001).
Along with greater ARS scores, a decreasing trend in the proportion of participants with a diagnosis of dementia was observed: in G0 78%, in Gl 82%, in G2 75%, and in G3 56% (p<0.001).