After adjusting for age and gender in his study, there was a highly significant difference between stage IV patients and stage I patients (HR = 8.81, 95% CI: 3.20-24.22, p = 0.000) ( 49 ).
Excerpts
According to the paired t-tests, all of the differences between the estimates yielded by the two methods are highly significant (p = 0.000).
For the oil phase, all criteria were highly significant ( p = 0.000), indicating strong effects on the dependent variables.
In the full cohort of HCC patients, preoperative CTC ≥ 2 had marginally significant association with increased tumor number (P = 0.067) and higher Edmonson grade (P = 0.064), while it had highly significant association with increased tumor size (P = 0.000), presence of PVTT (P = 0.000), and consequently higher BCLC stage (P = 0.000).
For the Root ZX device, ANOVA indicated a highly significant difference among conditions ( p = 0.000).
The path coefficient is extremely strong at 0.958, with a negligible standard deviation of 0.009, resulting in a very high T statistic of 101.679, indicating a highly significant relationship ( p value = 0.00). 2.
The suppression was highly significant ( p < 0.000).
Discriminant Analysis All trace and macro element concentrations included in the discriminant function analysis were highly significant in discriminating between the cruises (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.149; F = 47.30; p < 0.000; Table 4 ).
Results There was a highly significant improvement in knowledge immediately after training ( p < 0.00), with a net gain of marks from a mean value of 63.2% before training to 87.7% after training by 24.5% (95% CI 19.4, 29.6).
Subsequently, in moderation analysis, the moderating variable psychological contract breach is highly significant (β = 0.235, p-value = 0.000).
We noticed markedly significant improvement F (3,24) = 56.282, p<0.000 in short-term memory ( Fig. 11I ) as evidenced by discrimination index (i.e the difference between time spent exploring novel and familiar objects during test phase) in RNS60 treated 5XFAD mice as compared to untreated or NS-treated 5XFAD, but, 5XFAD mice showed profound impairment (p<0.000) as compared to age matched non-Tg mice.
The presence of articular disc displacement by MRI showed the highly significant difference in between Group 1 and Group 2 with P = 0.00 (Table 2 ).
The log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) for equality of survival curves shows a highly significant difference ( P = .000).
P value was highly significant ( P < 0.000).
Mean reduction in the CPIS Scores between both the groups was highly significant ( P = 0.000) as compared to the baseline CPIS Score [ Table 3 ].
A two sample t-test reveals this difference in slopes to be highly significant (t-statistic =17.4, p -value ≈0).
The hypothesis test demonstrated a highly significant relationship between awareness of consequences and attitude (H4) ( t = 8.164, p = 0).
A highly significant linear regression (P < 0.00) was found as PC1 = 5.2935-0.1179*LT.
The test of Sphericity was highly significant with χ2 = 193.8970 and p < 0.000.
It was a highly significant correlation between these two dimensions of spiritual well-being (religious well-being and existential well-being) (r=.74, p=.000) and also between each dimension and total score of spiritual well-being (r=.93, p=.000).
One-way ANOVA results were highly significant: size exponent ( F = 175.34, p = 0.0000) and duration exponent ( F = 200.08, p = 0.0000), indicating a systematic shift in avalanche dynamics with increasing sleep depth.
A highly significant difference was observed between BAG and Nano-HAP groups (mean difference = −8.731, p = 0.000), with the Nano-HAP group showing superior hardness values ( Table (3) , Table (4) , Figure (7) , Figure (8) ). 3.3 Correlation between phosphate and VHN Pearson correlation analysis across all groups revealed a statistically significant positive correlation between phosphate Raman peak intensity and Vickers microhardness values (r = 0.600, p = 0.000), suggesting that increased mineral content is generally associated with higher surface hardness.
The moderate level evidence suggested that there was a near-significant difference with more patients reporting tolerance in the LRD group (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02–1.11; P = 0.00).
The second canonical correlation coefficient with a value of r c 2 = 0.823 also confirms a highly significant relationship of the canonical variables ( p = 0.000), with greater weights for the variables ALT, UREA, and CHOL.
A highly significant, positive correlation was observed between poor sleep quality and fatigue levels (r = 0. 426, at p = 0.000) .