Excerpts

Between 1997 and 2004 the mean size of neophytes (mean CCL 99.3 cm, n = 1743 measurements, SD = 5.3 cm) was 1.8 cm smaller than that of remigrants (mean CCL 101.1 cm, n = 1599, SD = 5.3 cm), a difference that was highly significant ( t 3306 = 9.8, p < 0.001).

A highly significant vertical asymmetry was observed: 56.3% of all interventions were performed in the upper jaw compared to 43.7% in the lower jaw (χ 2 = 480.58, p < 0.001), a finding that remained significant after correction and is consistent with established epidemiological patterns.

Fitting proceeded by removing all variables which did not reach statistical significance, set at p < 0.001 due to the large number of participants.

In stark contrast, FSH demonstrated a modest yet highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.166, P < 0.001), indicating that each unit increase in ln-UCC corresponds to a measurable, albeit subtle, elevation in gonadotropin drive—a physiological signal of declining inhibin B feedback and early granulosa cell dysfunction.

Potential risk factors for calves’ ringworm As revealed in Table 1 , there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between ringworm infection and the investigated risk factors.

The multiple regression model fit was highly significant (F=10.14, 9 df, p<0.001) with an adjusted r square of 0.373.

our results showed a highly significant association between the Ki-67 PI and the pathological T stage of rectal cancer (P < .001).

Model 3: Determinants of Business Liquidity (Processing Continuity) FMCS emerges as the dominant and highly significant predictor of business liquidity ( β = 0.336, p < 0.001), indicating that a one-unit increase in financial management competency is associated with a 0.336-point increase in perceived liquidity ( Table 5 ).

Results: The mean duration of analgesia in Group A was 419.4 ± 115.35 minutes (95% CI 374.2 – 464.6), and in Group B was 656.6 ± 137.99 minutes (95% CI 602.5 – 710.7), which was highly significant (p<0.001).

Significant reductions were observed in the RFB group ( p < 0.05) and the MT group ( p < 0.01), while the CT group showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001).

In fact, the 3‐microRNA signature was consistently deregulated in a meta‐analysis performed on 15 different human and mouse datasets and revealed a highly significant pooled effect ( z = 5.33, P < 0.001) and standardized mean difference of 1.44 [lower interval: 0.91, upper interval: 1.98] (Fig 5I ).

6 ) showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

The main effect of type was highly significant, F (3.26,143.56) = 24.4, p < 0.001, GES = 0.201.

The 2-cluster solution was differently distributed over the 5 variables and according to the type of diagnoses (ICD-10; Table 1 ), and it was highly significant ( P< .001).

For ( ii ), two‐way ANOVA (Table S4 , Supporting Information) showed a highly significant effect of chloroform volume ( p < 0.001), whereas neither waiting time ( p ≈ 0.19) nor their interaction ( p ≈ 0.24) was significant.

This enhancement of vasoconstriction was highly significant ( P <0.001) at PE concentrations of 3×10 −7 to 10 −5 M ( Figure 1A ).

The seroprevalence rates of anti-HBs showed an increasing trend between 2011 and 2013 ( P <0.001).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( χ 2 = 3876.42, df = 153, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was appropriate for factor analysis.

However, comparing narrow (spectrum value of 1) and broad (spectrum value of 3), we find, as predicted, a highly significant association between broad-spectrum toxins and density-dependent regulation ( β : 4.1699; S.E.: 1.2196; P < 0.001).

The P treatment had highly significant effects on all traits ( p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

A highly significant positive correlation between K S-N and K S-MAX was found ( r = 0.99, p < 0.001), as well as significant positive correlations of K S-N and K S-MAX with K L-MAX and FX.

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.001) having a Nagelkerke R Square of 0.3, indicating that these factors explained more than 30% of the variation in the model.

However, a highly significant association was observed between tumor recurrence and the expression of PIWIL-2 and PIWIL-3, with mean ± SD values of 0.33 ± 0.23 (P = 0.001) and 0.28 ± 0.12 (P = 0.001), respectively.

The difference between the slopes was highly significant (F = 31.50, DFn = 1, DFd = 26, p < 0.001) ( Figure 6 ).

The mean ages were 44.1 ± 5.5 years in PERI, 52.6 ± 3.9 years in early PM, and 57.7 ± 5.4 years in late PM, with highly significant differences among groups (ANOVA F = 142.33, p < 0.001); post hoc analyses confirmed a stepwise increase (PERI < early PM < late PM, all p < 0.001).