We also found a very strong and highly significant correlation between the proportion of hornfels and retouched pieces in the studied sequence ( r = 0.934; p <0.001).
Excerpts
We additionally noted that the difference between the annotated numbers of AMGs and the expected frequencies of AMGs (calculated based on the proportion of genes of each category in the reference databases) (Additional file 2: Table S12) was statistically highly significant (chi-square p < 0.001).
This increase attained statistical significance at 12 hpi ( p < 0.05) and demonstrated a highly significant difference at 24 hpi ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 B).
The progressive nature of the IOP reduction was confirmed by a linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept for patient (n = 232 observations from 29 patient clusters): all time main effects were highly significant (Day 30 vs. baseline β = −6.12, 95% CI −6.93 to −5.30, p < 0.001; Day 90 β = −7.56, 95% CI −8.37 to −6.74, p < 0.001; Day 180 β = −8.56, 95% CI −9.37 to −7.74, p < 0.001).
The difference in the mean patient activation score from pretest to posttest of the control group (mean 2.04, SD 10.01) was not significant ( t 67 = 1.677, P = .10), whereas the intervention group showed a highly significant change (mean 5.967, SD 9.70, t 57 = 4.683, P < .001).
1a ); this difference was highly significant (general linear model: F (1, 38) = 323.812, P < 0.001).
The difference between mdx and WT was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Furthermore, both RPAz and LPAz demonstrated highly significant increases (P<0.001).
Table 2 shows a highly significant (p<0.001) difference in the distribution of post-operative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, with a greater percentage seen among obese patients who developed grade 2 (41.7%) and grade 4 (37.5%) complications.
Overall, teaching has a small but highly significant positive impact on students’ acceptance of evolution ( Z = 175,242.5, p < .001) ( Fig 1C ).
the amounts of variation explained by these variables while keeping other variables constant) on bacterial community variation were highly significant ( Fig. 4 ; P <0.001 with 1000 Monte Carlo permutations), even if coarse environmental descriptors were used in the study.
Pairwise comparisons demonstrated a significant decrease (p < 0.05) on Day 2 compared to Day 1, and a highly significant decrease (p < 0.001) on Days 3, 4, and 5.
The Kaplan-Meier analyses for DMFS as a function of the seven-gene signature showed highly significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups ( Figure 3B , P < 0.001 in the training set; P = 0.039 in the validation set).
This increase was highly significant, with a coefficient of 9.5% (95%CI 6.5–12.5%) per MRI ( p < 0.001).
These differences are robust across different age comparisons, with particularly strong effects observed in the transitions to ages 14 and 15, where the decrease in overlap compared to earlier ages consistently shows large effect sizes [HLe’s >3.0 (lower 95% CI >2.5)] and highly significant differences [all MWU p values <0.001].
The ANOVA with the within-subject factor Condition on ToT revealed a highly significant main effect, F (2, 34) = 72.42, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.81, ε = 0.74.
(I) A highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) was found between the infiltration of coloring agent in the enamel and the dentine, all groups considered.
Net PIPR displayed different reactions to wavelengths (0.13 mm for Parkinson’s patients and 0.61 mm for healthy subjects, proving an extremely significant differentiation ( p < 0.001)).
In both cases, this decrease was highly significant (p < 0.001).
The combination of moderate inter-rater agreement with highly significant group-level performance (mean accuracy 76.12%, p = 0.001) indicates that discriminative information is objectively present in the sonifications (as validated in Section 3.4 ) and perceptually accessible to human listeners, but that exploiting this information requires perceptual acuity that varies across individuals.
The summary of between-subjects’ effects in Table 1 indicates that both Age and Instruction have a highly significant influence on rate of reading scores ( p < 0.001).
Interleukin 6 was reduced in both FO Groups, indicating the anti-inflammatory effect of fish oil consumption, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001) between Non-Ovx + FO versus Non-Ovx + CO.
On the second day after a 10-day session of electric shocks in Context 1, the context conditioning was observed as a highly significant difference of behavioral response amplitudes in two contexts in all groups (panel “after learning”, Figure 3B , p < 0.001 for all groups, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, z = 3.6 for G1, z = 3.9 for G2, z = 3.5 for G3).
Mutations in rrl gene for the NTM were highly significant with a p value of <0.001.
A statistically highly significant difference ( P = 0.001) was obtained with the presence of caries in second molar adjacent to mesioangular third molar in class I and level B.