Excerpts

MANCOVA revealed a highly significant group difference ( F 4/61 = 34.03; p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.69).

MANOVA statistical analysis revealed a highly significant overall association between heavy metal profiles and pathohistological categories (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.038, F(36,316.52) = 12.177, p < 0.001), demonstrating that elemental accumulation patterns varied distinctively across tissue categories.

Notably, the direct effect of smoking decreased from 0.582 to 0.364 after accounting for mediators, yet remained highly significant (P<0.001), indicating that 62.5% of smoking’s impact operates through pathways not captured by these three mediators—presumably including direct epithelial toxicity, oxidative stress, protease-antiprotease imbalance, and immune dysregulation.

The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in plasma apelin concentrations based on CAD severity (Mann–Whitney U = 843, p <0.001).

The between-group difference was highly significant (Figure 9 ; p<0.001), with the magnitude of improvement in the test group approximately seven times greater than that of the control group (Figure 10 ) Bleeding Index Day 14 At Day 14, both groups demonstrated statistically significant reductions in BI from baseline (Figure 11 ).

Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001).

The difference in mean VAS scores between the two groups was highly significant (P < 0.001), clearly establishing the superiority of the intraoperative local anesthetic cocktail administered in Group-A over regional anesthesia alone in Group-B for immediate post-operative pain control following knee arthroscopy.

There was significant variation in knowledge gain among courses (SD 1.50, p = 0.031) and highly significant variation among learners within courses (SD 2.14, p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant positive Spearman’s rank correlation between serum and saliva scores ( ρ = 0.75, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).

Results were interpreted as highly significant*** (p < 0.001), significant** (p < 0.01), weakly significant* (p < 0.05) or not significant ns (p > 0.05).

However, using one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons, the correlation of MAO-A levels to Aβ plaque levels was highly significant ([ 18 F]FAZIN3 versus [ 18 F]flotaza, p = 0.001 and [ 18 F]FAZIN3 versus [ 125 I]IBETA, p = 0.01), whereas [ 18 F]FAZIN3 versus [ 125 I]IPPI and [ 18 F]FEPPA were not significant.

As shown in Figure 2 , highly significant (p < 0.001) differences between resected and biopsy healthy colon samples were observed for all the VEGF family members.

A highly significant positive correlation ( P ≤ 0.001) between spike compactness and FHB was also evident in all the three environments.

1a ); this difference was highly significant (general linear model: F (1, 38) = 323.812, P < 0.001).

All the associations between sleep difficulties and paranoid ideation remained highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) when the analyses were repeated controlling for the presence of hallucinations.

In our aforementioned study, the systematic inaccuracies revealed highly significant (F tests, p<0.001 for 6 out of 10 subjects).

The dose–response was highly significant both for data reported as %DNA in tail and after conversion to lesions/10 6 bp using the laboratory-specific calibration curves ( P < 0.001).

Although it was associated with all three finger patterns, Type II lip print associated with loop fingerprint is highly significant (68%) ( P < 0.001) followed by arch fingerprint pattern and whorl fingerprint pattern.

There was a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 64.03, df = 6, p = 0.001) in prey species composition between battle and control sites.

conducted a large safety database review and found a highly significant increase in the incidence of myocarditis in combination nivolumab and ipilimumab therapy versus nivolumab monotherapy (0.27% vs. 0.06%; p<0.001; 5 fatal events vs. 1) ( 40 ).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a highly significant main effect of trial-type (cued vs. non-cued; F (1,11) = 65.1; p < 0.001), but neither a main effect of group ( F < 1), nor a group by trial-type interaction ( F (1,11) = 1.1; p > 0.20).

The improvement was statistically highly significant ( P < .001).

A highly significant difference between groups was found regarding the duration of hospital stay ( P < .001) characterized by a mean of 11.19 ± 3.82 days for those who developed recurrent bleeding and 5.35 ± 4.33 days for those who had no rebleeding ( Table 1 ).

This increase was partly driven by increased abundance of Acarospora , Polyblastia , and Cetrelia , an observation supported by PERMANOVA analyses showing highly significant effects of latitude on the taxonomic composition of the lichenised fungal guild ( F 1,27 = 3.35, p = 0.001).

The main effect of condition ( F (1, 49) = 3.89, p = 0.057) only approached significance and the main effect of subscale ( F (2, 48) = 20.89, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.47) was statistically significant.