The results remained consistent, with significant differences in mean age, PAASI and AKs, all showing a decreasing trend with increasing MN count ( p < 0.001), while PLR increased ( p = 0.01).
Excerpts
There was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in HR after the second needle stimulation (phase e) compared to the two control intervals (a, b) before stimulation.
PERMANOVA revealed that treatment combination explained 57.5% of the total variation (R 2 = 0.575) and the effect was highly significant ( p = 0.001) ( Table S5 ).
Cochran’s Q test confirmed a highly significant overall difference in the proportion of correct shade matches among the three methods (Q = 94.62, df = 2, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).
In 110 determinations, the correlation coefficient was r = 0.9945, highly significant (p <0.001) and the regression equation y = 0.9991x – 0.0232.
3 ), with highly significant positive correlation across sites ( r = 0.77; P < 0.001) and time of sowing ( r = 0.73; P < 0.001).
Retention of obturator prosthesis had a highly significant association with QoL ( P < 0.001).
A comparison of the in-brace correction in two similar groups of patients diagnosed with this A1 curve pattern showed a highly significant increase in-brace correction treated with the modern design in comparison with the group treated with the classic design (76.6 versus 45.3%, p < .001).
As shown in Figure 2 , YAP1 protein levels were downregulated by 41% in AD brains relative to NC brains, which was highly significant (***, p < 0.001, n = 5/group by t -test).
Results At the end of treatment (EOT), there was a highly significant increase in platelet count ( p < 0.001), a significant increase in white blood cells (WBCs) count ( p ≤ 0.032), and a highly significant decrease in hemoglobin level ( p < 0.001) as compared to pretreatment levels.
The GSUS and the PDUS scores for all joint areas, except the PDUS score of the hip, exhibited a significant improvement (p < 0.05), while the GSUS of the knee showed even a highly significant (p < 0.001) change.
Indeed, even for the Lateral targets, a situation that needs a priori reduced APA because of the advantages of the gravity effects on the frontal plane during the SP (Patla et al., 1993 ; Lepers and Brenière, 1995 ; Lyon and Day, 1997 ; Sparto et al., 2014 ), this difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001).
We observed a rather weak, but highly significant correlation between cytoplasmic Gal-8 and Gal-9 staining ( p < 0.001). 3.
The chi-square test of independence revealed a highly significant association between Ct value and RT-RAA assay sensitivity (p-value < 0.001).
Results Comparison of the survival proportions between treated and control groups showed that fluralaner insecticidal efficacy was highly significant in both trials ( P < 0.001 or P < 0.01 in different assessments) through to day 56.
Of note, although the difference in glycemia between the 2 test groups was a highly significant one (P<0.001), this did not translate into significantly higher levels of AGEs, AOPP (AOPPs, AOPPldl or AOPPhdl) or lipoprotein peroxidation (oxLDL and oxHDL) ( Table II ).
There were highly significant positive correlations between perception of vulnerability (PERC_VULN) and perception of risk of illness (PERC_RISK_ILL), r(250) = 0.48, p < 0.001; (PERC_VULN) and perception of risk of vaccination (PERC_RISK_VACC), r(250) = 0.21, p < 0.001; preventive behavior (PREV_BEHAV) and PERC_RISK_VACC, r(250) = 0.25, p < 0.001.
For hospital admission, the global model was highly significant ( χ 2 = 1094.2 ; p < 0.001 ; Nagelkerke R 2 = 0.464 ; correct classification 82.1%).
Correlations between the adjectives in the second factor were also highly significant ( p < 0.001), with values of correlation coefficients between 0.331 and 0.604.
ANOVA indicated highly significant genotypic differences for all traits ( P < 0.001; Supplementary Table S3).
The interaction between genotype and salinity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for yield ( Table 1 ).
About 22.50% of patients led sedentary lifestyle as compared to 7.5% in controls, the difference being statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001) in the study by Daulatabad D et al .[ 14 ] The duration of complaints noted was 13-24 months in 40% of patients, closely followed by 3-12 months in 37.5%, 25- 60 months in 17.5% and more than 60 months in 5% of cases.
A paired t -test comparing the accuracy of the participants in the first training session and the last training session (11 th session) showed a highly significant difference ( t (14) = 4.32, p <0.001), Figure 4 .
The deviation from equal proportions was highly significant (χ 2 = 25.33, df = 1, P < 0.001).
On further analysis, statistically significant correlations were observed among the different periodontal parameters studied with the age and gender of the subjects and the predicted tobacco/nicotine dependence which included potential correlations among age and PPD ( P value = 0.0420), age and CAL ( P value = 0.0040), gender and GI ( P value = 0.0320), gender and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0210), GI and OHI-S ( P value = 0.0240), GI and PPD ( P value = 0.0180), and GI and CAL ( P value = 0.0050), while the results were found to be statistically highly significant in case of the correlations derived between OHI-S and CAL ( P value = 0.0010) and PPD and CAL ( P value = 0.0001) with several clinical implications of interest.