Mean absolute value in joint line height difference between groups was not significant ( p = 0.235) but highly significant for PCO ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
According to Avnet et al .,[ 15 ] after an initial learning curve of 20 examinations, trainees succeeded in identifying 97%–98% of structures, with a highly significant degree of agreement with the expert’s analysis ( P < 0.001).
The post hoc Dunn test revealed that for both groups, the OHIP-14 scores showed a highly significant improvement (p<0.001) from baseline to both the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups.
In contrast, nationality demonstrated a highly significant association with biologic allocation (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001), as did recoded ethnicity (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001).
Statistical significance was p < 0.05, with highly significant results reported as p < 0.001.
The tibia length of adults from both aphid species were smaller on the infected plants than on the non-infected plants ( Table S1 ), although the effect was only marginally significant for R. padi ( M. dirhodum : F 1,72 = 43.22, p <0.001; R. padi : F 1,83 = 3.61, p = 0.061).
When these times were compared using a paired t -test the result was highly significant (t = 5.88, df = 20, p < 0.001).
4.3 Structural model assessment 4.3.1 Measurement model and construct weight analysis As shown in Table 8 , the weights of all three first-order dimensions of the Push Effect were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The correlation between the total values of CSS and UIS remained moderately significant, albeit somewhat lower ( r =0.42; P ≤.001), indicating that the association persists regardless of search duration.
However, sensitivity analyses indicated the presence of pleiotropy, as Cochran’s Q and Rücker’s Q′ were both highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S7 ).
Results: All scores depicted highly significant statistical improvement over baseline scores ( P < 0.001).
A significant trend was observed between the phosphate quartiles (p<0.001).
Overall, the pre- to postintervention reduction in scores on EPDS ( d = 2.23) and STAI ( d = 2.42) was highly significant (P < 0.001) with a very large effect size.
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure verified the sampling adequacy for the analysis ( KMO = 0.83, p < 0.001), and Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 1087.42, p < 0.001).
Two-way ANOVA revealed a nonsignificant main effect of treatment [ F (1, 12) = 3.273, p = 0.096, η 2 p = 0.214], a highly significant main effect of time [ F (2, 12) = 359.273, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.984], and a significant treatment × time interaction effect [ F (2, 12) = 42.545, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.876] on CYP450 activity.
Root length density of cover crop variants The ANOVA results revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of the CC variants and year on the RLD at 0–60 cm and the top 0–10 cm at RUZ and LUK, whereas the effect was not significant at subsoil depths of 40–50 and 50–60 cm.
There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) correlation between the study areas and respondents' educational level.
5 E) revealing a highly significant difference in the PPT@PG 1.5 %BG group ( P < 0.001).
A highly significant association was also observed between pain management strategy and side effects (p < 0.001).
The consumption of foods not recommended for diabetics was highly significant in rural rather than urban subjects p<0.001, in subjects with poor glycaemic control (HbAc1>7%) rather than good p<0.001.
Isolation by coastal distance We detected highly significant IBD across the sampling range ( r = 0.86, p ‐value <0.001; Figure 4 ).
A highly significant decrease of Adlercreutzia equolifaciens ( P < 0.001) was detected only in PSC patients without concomitant IBD.
The type of solvent and nHA percentages were two different independent variables, and differences considered statistically significant in p < 0.05, very significant in p < 0.01, and highly significant in p < 0.001.
There were highly significant differences in microbiota composition between treated and untreated quails in caecum ( t = 1.652, P = 0.001), faeces ( t = 1.759, P = 0.001), and large intestine, although the level of significance of the latter was lower than the other two origins ( t = 1.512, P = 0.036).