Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP ≤0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For instance, as is shown in Table 1 , the two-way rANO-VAs with repeated measure “Time” and independent factor “Strain” always yielded a highly significant main effect of factor “Strain,” as well as a highly significant main effect of interaction between this factor and “Time” (eg, P ≤0.001 for sleep measure in any of these rANOVAs).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Data Analysis The experiment was plotted using Origin 2021 software; the experimental data were expressed as mean ± standard error and analyzed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis statistical analysis using SPSS25.0 software, with p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference, p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely highly significant difference. 3.
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The more precise lipidomic analysis of long chain FA uptake for example (Figure 3D) contains 363 measurements and is highly significant ( P < .001) as is the correlation with long-term reverse remodelling ( n = 231, from seven patients, P < .001, Supplementary Table 3).
Hemoglobin levels (43.8 versus 65.3 g/L; P = 0.094) and hematocrit (14.3% versus 20.7%; P = 0.150) were lower in the autologous blood group, and white cell count was higher (0.15 × 10 9 /L versus 0.06 × 10 9 /L; P = 0.071), despite using identical volumes of PRBCs, but this did not reach statistical significance; platelet counts were however statistically lower in the banked blood group (45.0 × 10 9 /L versus 0.9 × 10 9 /L; P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a statistically very highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference of mean gap between Group A and Group B on all four tooth surfaces, being greater in Group A than Group B. 95% CI of the mean difference on the gap in between Group A and Group B ranged within 79.8–147.1 μ on the buccal tooth surface, 62.6–117.3 μ on the distal tooth surface, 88.5–128.6 μ on the lingual surface, and 76.1–115 μ on the mesial surface.